
ISIS Summit Vienna 2015—The Information Society at the Crossroads
Part of the International Society for Information Studies series
3–7 Jun 2015, Vienna, Austria
- Go to the Sessions
-
- I. Invited Speech
- S1. Conference Stream DTMD 2015
- S2. Conference Stream ICPI 2015
- S3. Conference Stream ICTS 2015
- T1. Conference Track: (Big) history of information
- T1.0. Conference Track: Advanced hair-splitting (combinatorics)
- T1.0.1. Conference Track: Andrew Feenberg's technical politics and ICTs
- T1.1. Conference Track: As we may teach
- T1.2. Conference Track: China and the global information society
- T1.3. Conference Track: Communication, information and reporting
- T1.4. Conference Track: Cyberpeace
- T2. Conference Track: Emancipation or disempowerment of man?
- T2.1. Conference Track: Emergence of and in (self-)organizing work systems
- T2.2. Conference Track: Emergent systems, information and society
- T3. Conference Track: Empowering patients
- T3.0. Conference Track: Homo informaticus
- T3.1. Conference Track: Human resilience and human vulnerability
- T3.2. Conference Track: ICT and literature
- T3.3. Conference Track: ICTs and power relations
- T4. Conference Track: Information in the exact sciences and symmetry
- T5. Conference Track: Informational warfare
- T6. Conference Track: Multi-level semiosis
- T7. Conference Track: Music, information and symmetry
- T7.1. Conference Track: Natural disasters
- T7.2. Conference Track: Progress in Information Studies in China
- T8. Conference Track: Searching to create a humanized civilization
- T8.1. Conference Track: The ethics of foundations
- T9. Conference Track: The Global Brain
- T9.1. Conference Track: Transdisciplinary response and responsibility
- T9.2. Conference Track: Triangular relationship
- T9.3. Conference Track: Weaving the understanding of information
- Event Details
Conference Chairs
Sessions
I. Invited SpeechS1. Conference Stream DTMD 2015
S2. Conference Stream ICPI 2015
S3. Conference Stream ICTS 2015
T1. Conference Track: (Big) history of information
T1.0. Conference Track: Advanced hair-splitting (combinatorics)
T1.0.1. Conference Track: Andrew Feenberg's technical politics and ICTs
T1.1. Conference Track: As we may teach
T1.2. Conference Track: China and the global information society
T1.3. Conference Track: Communication, information and reporting
T1.4. Conference Track: Cyberpeace
T2. Conference Track: Emancipation or disempowerment of man?
T2.1. Conference Track: Emergence of and in (self-)organizing work systems
T2.2. Conference Track: Emergent systems, information and society
T3. Conference Track: Empowering patients
T3.0. Conference Track: Homo informaticus
T3.1. Conference Track: Human resilience and human vulnerability
T3.2. Conference Track: ICT and literature
T3.3. Conference Track: ICTs and power relations
T4. Conference Track: Information in the exact sciences and symmetry
T5. Conference Track: Informational warfare
T6. Conference Track: Multi-level semiosis
T7. Conference Track: Music, information and symmetry
T7.1. Conference Track: Natural disasters
T7.2. Conference Track: Progress in Information Studies in China
T8. Conference Track: Searching to create a humanized civilization
T8.1. Conference Track: The ethics of foundations
T9. Conference Track: The Global Brain
T9.1. Conference Track: Transdisciplinary response and responsibility
T9.2. Conference Track: Triangular relationship
T9.3. Conference Track: Weaving the understanding of information
Instructions for Authors
Procedure for Submission, Peer-Review, Revision and Acceptance of Extended Abstracts
The conference will accept extended abstracts only. The accepted abstracts will be available online on Sciforum.net during and after the conference. Papers based on the extended abstracts can be published by authors in the journal of their choice later on. The conference will not publish a proceedings volume.
Submissions of abstracts should be done by the authors online. If you do not already have an user account with this website, please create one by registering with sciforum.net. After registration, please log in to your user account, and use the Submit New Abstract. Please chose the ISIS Summit Vienna 2015 conference in the first step. In the second step, choose the appropriate conference stream or conference session. In the third step you will be asked to type in the title, abstract and optionally keywords. In the fourth and last step, you will be asked to enter all co-authors, their e-mail addresses and affiliations.
- Scholars interested in participating in paper sessions of the Summit can submit their extended abstract (about 750 to 2'000 words) online on this website until 27 February 2015.
- The International Program Committee will review and decide about the suitability of abstracts for the ISIS Summit Vienna 2015. All authors will be notified by 20 March 2015 about the acceptance of their extended abstract.
- If the abstract is accepted for this conference, the authors will be asked to send the a formatted version of the extended abstract as a PDF file by end of May 2015.
- Please register with the conference before or once your abstract is accepted. Please note that the acceptance of an abstract will not automatically register you with the conference. The abstract submission and conference registration are two separate processes.
Please use the abstract template. The formatted version of the extended abstracts must have the following organization:
- Title
- Full author names
- Affiliations (including full postal address) and authors' e-mail addresses
- Extended Abstract (750 to 2'000 words)
- References
- Paper Format: A4 paper format, the printing area is 17.5 cm x 26.2 cm. The margins should be 1.75 cm on each side of the paper (top, bottom, left, and right sides).
- Paper Length: The manuscript should be about 3 pages long (incl. references).
- Formatting / Style: Please use the template to prepare your abstract (see on top of this page).
- References & Citations: The full titles of cited papers and books must be given. Reference numbers should be placed in square brackets [ ], and placed before the punctuation; for example [4] or [1-3], and all the references should be listed separately and as the last section at the end of the manuscript.
- Authors List and Affiliation Format: Authors' full first and last names must be given. Abbreviated middle name can be added. For papers written by various contributors a corresponding author must be designated. The PubMed/MEDLINE format is used for affiliations: complete street address information including city, zip code, state/province, country, and email address should be added. All authors who contributed significantly to the manuscript (including writing a section) should be listed on the first page of the manuscript, below the title of the article. Other parties, who provided only minor contributions, should be listed under Acknowledgments only. A minor contribution might be a discussion with the author, reading through the draft of the manuscript, or performing English corrections.
- Figures, Schemes and Tables: Authors are encouraged to prepare figures and schemes in color. Figure and schemes must be numbered (Figure 1, Scheme I, Figure 2, Scheme II, etc.) and a explanatory title must be added. Tables should be inserted into the main text, and numbers and titles for all tables supplied. All table columns should have an explanatory heading. Please supply legends for all figures, schemes and tables. The legends should be prepared as a separate paragraph of the main text and placed in the main text before a table, a figure or a scheme.
Copyright to the extended abstracts will stay with the authors of the paper. Authors will be asked to grant MDPI AG (Publisher of the Sciforum platform) and ISIS (organizer of the conference) a non-exclusive, non-revokable license to publish the abstracts online and possibly in print under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license. As authors retain the rights to their abstracts and papers, papers can be published elsewhere later.
List of accepted submissions (217)
Id | Title | Authors | Presentation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
sciforum-004155 | The Biological Tricks That Knit A Global Brain | N/A |
Show Abstract |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Introduction When it comes to your deepest, darkest nature, there’s a whole lot of accusing going on. The fight or flight folks tell you that your biology comes complete with an overwhelming instinct for survival. Rational-choice-obsessed specialists like economists and evolutionary psychologists claim that you are not only preprogrammed for survival at all costs, but that you are wired to maximize your personal gains. And evolutionary biologists like William Hamilton, Richard Dawkins and Robert Trivers assert that you are biologically programmed to maximize the spread of your selfish genes. These claims about your most intimate nature are concealed in the very foundations of many of the social and evolutionary sciences, from evolutionary biology and evolutionary psychology to political science, sociology, philosophy, and economics. They are buried deep below the surface in the form of assumptions—often hidden assumptions. But these assumptions about your innermost self are only half-right. More important, they are half-wrong. And the half that’s wrong throws evolutionary and social sciences way off base. Which may explain why one of the most lauded and mathematically savvy economists of his day, Irving Fisher, told the New York Times in mid-October, 1929, that stocks were about to go “a good deal higher within a few months.” Then on October 29th came Black Tuesday and the great crash of 1929. Like the economy, your biology often refuses to follow the paths that scientific assumptions about survival and selfishness would predict. Yes, some of your internal mechanisms do work to stack up your survival advantages. And to maximize your sexual prizes. But you are also plagued with internal mechanisms that do the very opposite, biological mechanisms that hobble you: depression, anxiety, brain freeze, and even impulses toward suicide. What’s more, on occasion you are willing to sacrifice your life for something higher than yourself. Ten million followed that inner call in the First World War. Your self-destruct mechanisms—human self-destruct mechanisms--are not unique. They’ve been integral to the 3.85-billion-year history of life. They are similar to apoptotic mechanisms, the “programmed cell death” mechanisms, that individual cells in a bacterial society or in your body use to commit suicide. Why do self-destruct mechanisms of this sort exist? Because the believers in the survival instinct, the rational choice model, and the selfish gene miss something. Something big. Your biology is not wired strictly for personal gain. It is wired to make you a component in something far greater than yourself. It is wired to make you a module in a collective learning machine, a complex adaptive system, a parallel-processing search engine, a group IQ, a social intelligence. You are wired to be a neuron in a social brain. A neuron in a brain that, like you, collaborates to make something bigger than itself: a global brain. Methods This talk is based on the research for my first two books, The Lucifer Principle: A Scientific Expedition into the Forces of History and Global Brain: The Evolution of Mass Mind from the Big Bang to the 21st Century. That research drew heavily on work in evolutionary biology, evolutionary psychology, artificial intelligence, animal behavior, experimental psychology, neuroscience, psychoneuroimmunology, anthropology, and history. It involved the use of over 4,000 reference sources. Results and Discussion The common wisdom—and the accepted view in evolutionary biology—is that we humans and our animal cousins are built with a survival instinct. An instinct that watches out for our personal survival, and for personal survival ahead of everything else. Yet when we encounter a saber tooth tiger on a pathway, we have three modes of response: not just Walter Bradford Cannon’s fight or flight, but fight, flight, or freeze. And freeze can be suicide. That’s not the only suicidal mechanism locked into our biology. When you’re about to take that all-important math test and you’ve studied for weeks, then finally open the test booklet, your mind locks up. It refuses to remember a thing. That anxiety blackout is not a product of a patriarchal civilization, industrialism, or capitalism. It is a product of your biology. When you are fired or your wife tells you she is leaving you, your survival instinct should put your mind into overdrive. It should give you the juice to hunt with energy and creativity for your next step. But high-power cognitive processing is not what your biology serves up. Instead, it bogs you in depression, a state in which it’s hard to think of even tying your shoes. How do mental paralysis and depression up your odds of survival? They don’t. So what gives? How could natural selection possibly favor such obvious self-destruct mechanisms? The answer is in the algorithms that power collective intelligences, mass learning machines like neural nets and the immune system. Rules that turn down the flow of resources and influence to the nodes that fail to cope with the problems of the moment and turn up the resource-flow and the influence of the nodes that have a handle on things. Conclusions We need a radical overhaul of the assumptions underlying many of our sciences and many of our pop-cultural beliefs. Yes, we need to recognize our survival instincts and our selfish biological built-ins. But we also need to see our role in something higher than ourselves—complex adaptive systems, neural-net-like collective learning machines. If we do, many of the “irrational” mysteries that make the predictions of so many social scientists wrong may suddenly appear to be rational after all. References and Notes
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sciforum-004908 | The Role of Online Booking Systems (wang shang gua hao) in Transforming Patient Experience and China's Healthcare Reform | , | N/A |
Show Abstract |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Introduction China has a long-standing problem for patients to queue and book appointments with doctors (gua hao) in real life, especially with those medical experts (zhuan jia hao). The demands for expert doctors in 3AAA hospitals are extremely high, leading to a hidden market for scalpers to trade doctors’ appointment notes. To tackle this problem, China introduced a series of regulations in the year of 2009 as a means of healthcare reform, and required these 3AAA hospitals to adopt the Online Booking Systems (wang shang gua hao; abbreviated as OBS below) gradually – in which patients can book with doctors in advance by their personal identity information and doctors can easily access his/her clinical record before the appointment [1]. This is quite similar to GP online services offered by NHS (i.e. www.chooseandbook.nhs.uk); but it can be both managed by public institutions such as Beijing Health Bureau (www.bjguahao.gov.cn) and private funds (http://www.guahao.com/). This paper aims to examine how these online booking systems can transform patient experience. Methods This study interviews five groups of middle-aged people (with 3 – 5 people each group) in Beijing, mainly focusing on their experience of booking appointments with doctors as well as those of their relatives/friends [2]. A set of semi-structured questions are asked to identify the extent to which the OBS have changed patients’ behaviors/perceptions, as well as to examine what factors have constrained their adoption of OBS [3]. Meanwhile, this study will assess the impact of technological change in relation to various socio-economic factors [4]. Throughout this process, participants will be asked to identify problems needing to be the most urgently tackled, regarding China’s healthcare reform. Lastly, their views towards electronic medical records are investigated in relation to the privacy issue. Results and Discussion In overall, participants interviewed by this study have shown positive attitudes towards the Online Booking Systems (OBS), mainly due to its accessible feature – i.e. People can take the initiative in terms of scheduling their own appointments (Besides this, many of them also use the telephone platform “114” as an alternative to make appointments). But it is clear that numbers of appointments allocated to OBS are limited [5]. Moreover, some criticize these technological advancements as a “temporary medical relief that only treat the symptom”, given the fact that 1) the supply of medical resources – still unevenly distributed both at the national and regional level – cannot meet the demand of patients and 2) the scarcity of expert doctors exacerbate patients’ willingness to strive for the perceived “best” medical service – despite few complained about the quality of these experts. On this basis, factors such as “illness seriousness”, “emergency extent” (mainly means those needing operations) etc. could pressure patients or their relatives to buy expert doctors’ appointment notes from scalpers for higher prices. Regarding the electronic medical records, most participants interviewed in this group have shown some extent of agreement on sharing them with their doctors as well as for further medical research; while they strongly opposed letting third parties to use them for commercial purposes (e.g. recommending medicine). References and Notes
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sciforum-003926 | Philosophical Thinking on the Essence of Information | N/A |
Show Abstract |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The question what is the essence of information must be answered for philosophy of information and information science and technology research. However, views on this issue are still divergent. This paper has made the analysis and argumentation about the essence of information by the method of dialectical materialism, and points out that the essence of information are the relations between things and internal things, and this relationship formed information. Due to the connection between the protean and endless things, thus produce the endless, dazzling and variant information. To grasp the essence of information, much attention should be paid to the specific form of information and information processing, the reorganization, transmission, storage, utilization. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sciforum-004456 | The Role of Information and Values in the Participatory Analysis of Social-Ecological Systems | , | N/A |
Show Abstract |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Introduction Objectivism, supposing that information is ‘out there’ and can be accessed through appropriate research methods, is a valuable and unavoidable initial stance in field work. However, even within an objectivist paradigm, information gathered from field work can never be accepted uncritically, however rigorous the research methodology, since each step of the process from the choice of methodology onwards is driven and circumscribed by the values and beliefs of the participants. In response to the growing threat of climatic change researchers are increasingly utilising social surveys to access information on human-environment interactions or the operation of “social-ecological” systems, in order to preserve key functions into the future. This paper explores the sources of uncertainty which emerge as simple environmental data transfers from participant to researcher. In particular, it considers the role that values can play in determining the quality of participant-reported quantitative environmental data, presented within the framework of Shannon’s standard communication model. Gathering information from interviews and surveys Survey participants have a theory of the world. The knowledge they possess is dependent on this theory [1]. In the philosophy of information, the information exists in a specific level of abstract [2]. Participants’ theories encompass the values – ethical, political, social, and religious – they have developed in their life and work. The researcher has a different theory of the world. He/she too comes with a framework equally embedded within a set of values, different from those of the participants. In qualitative research, an interpretative stance recognises the context-dependence of knowledge: “Interpretive methods of research start from the position that our knowledge of reality, including the domain of human action, is a social construction by human actors and that this applies equally to researchers. Thus there is no objective reality which can be discovered by researchers and replicated by others, in contrast to the assumptions of positivist science” [3] What about accessing numbers through interviews and surveys? If an interviewed farmer tells a researcher “my yield was 8.5 tonnes”, what is the status of the “8.5 tonnes”? To explore the status of apparently simple numerical data we model the data acquisition using the standard communication model due to Shannon [4], consisting of: a message source; encoder; noisy channel; decoder and message destination. Although the validity of using the Shannon model outside its origin in the engineering of telecommunication systems has been contested (see for example [5] and [6]), it provides a convenient structure to explore issues with research data which would need to be addressed, whatever the model. The supposed ‘perfect’ data exists as the message generated at the source, and we explore what becomes of this message as it travels to the destination where the data is embedded in the work of the researcher.
Our case study is a field study conducted in the Vietnamese portion of the Mekong Delta, which aimed at quantifying the benefits local farmers receive from an environmental service, the deposition of nutrient-rich fluvial sediments during the annual monsoon. A case study: rice farmers in Vietnam Accessing quantitative, environmental, data through social surveys has, as a methodology, seen rapid growth in recent years, particularly as a result of approaches such as the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework [7] which are used to evaluate the success of human adaptations to environmental change (seem [8], [9] and [10]) by measuring the capital - natural, human, social, and economic - at the disposal of the participant. The work considered here was an expedition to Vietnam aiming to access information on the impact of climate change and changing farming practices on the farmers of the Mekong Delta. In April and May 2014 a native English speaking researcher teamed up with five native Vietnamese speaking researchers to conduct 434 interviews spread across 19 villages and two provinces of the Delta. The interviews were conducted in Vietnamese, with the enumerator asking closed quantitative questions, recording the response in Vietnamese, and later translating and converting it into digital format, before forwarding it to the English-speaking researcher for processing. Among the information sought from the interviews were: farm size, amount of fertilizer used; depth of sediment following the annual flooding; and crop yields. We can explore where and how the numbers degrade at each stage of the communication model. 1 Issues with the source (the farmer). The farmer might be thinking of the wrong number for various reasons.
2 Issues with coding. The farmer might know the correct number but report it incorrectly for various reasons.
3 Noise in the communication channel. The farmer might report the right number but the researcher might receive it incorrectly for various reasons such as mishearing an answer, errors in transcription (a common issue was that survey enumerators would write the answer in the wrong answer box, or not in a box at all), or errors in translation 4 Issues with the decoding or mismatch between the coding/decoding including misunderstanding units. For example, two different units of land area are used, both called Cong. One is the ‘new’ 1000m2 and the other is the ‘old’ 1300m2 but both are still in use. Also, misunderstanding of what the number signifies. For example, some farmers reported rice in dry weight, as opposed to wet, which substantially reduces the number. 5 Issues with the destination (the researcher). For example, asking the wrong person and/or at the wrong location – perhaps made a mistake when sampling, or just poor understanding of the issue being investigated. Influence of the location of the interviews In this section we go in-depth into one error formed during the farmer’s coding process. A challenge of overseas fieldwork is that it is not always possible to maintain full control over the execution of the project, and this is particularly the case in Vietnam where the political context can have a strong influence. The initial aim of this fieldwork project was to run all farmer interviews individually at the farmer’s homestead however, due to preferences of the local authority, more than half the interviews were ultimately conducted in large groups. The group setting meant farmers were subject to greater peer scrutiny while reporting their data, but perhaps less governmental scrutiny. This introduced a new potential avenue for the farmer’s values to create errors in their reported data. In order to probe further into the impact of these particular values, some statistical analysis was conducted on the reported data. After controlling for some key factors affecting the yield achieved by rice farmers we found that the binary variable of either an individual or group setting had a significant (p<0.01) correlation with yield, with the group setting increasing the mean yield reported by 0.26 (± 0.13) tonnes (around 3%). The role of values While at first sight, at least, some of the sources of error are accidental (such as mishearing a number), many are also a consequence of value. The extent to which such sources of error affect the farmer’s reported data depends on the difference between what he/she values compared to the researcher values: do they prioritise: honesty/scientific advancement (an ethical concern), fear of authority (political), personal feelings towards the researcher (including racial biases), general pride, or social standing (social). The difference in values reported in home interviews compared to group discussions demonstrates a second-order impact of values: the data reported by the farmer depends on the farmer’s perception of the values of the witnesses. Almost all of the researcher’s errors can be reduced through increasing the time/diligence with which the interviews are conducted. Hence, the magnitude of the error on the researcher’s side is dependent on what they value more: accuracy of the data (less interviews but more accurate data) which ensures work will stand up to scrutiny of peers, or statistical operability (more interviews but less accurate data) which may affect whether the work is publishable. Discussion Numbers are never value-free. Numbers only have meaning by virtue of their context, and the decision to select one parameter over another already entails implicit or explicit value judgments. The decision to investigate rice farming in the Mekong Delta was embedded in a set of values of the geography department of the University of Southampton, itself embedded in the values of several wider communities. The researcher then identifies the need for numbers, but these numbers have meaning within the abstraction of the research. They do not have the same meaning in the minds of the farmers. This paper attempts to explore the consequences of the fact that the numbers are embedded in values. Given that the research requires specific data (amount of fertilizer used; depth of sediment; crop yields), it is suggested that the data acquired is unavoidably influenced by the values of the farmers and the society in which they live and work, by the values of the research team, and by the interaction of values of all the actors involved. In the present context of intensifying environmental change, the use of numbers reporting on human-environment interactions accessed through quantitative surveys is only likely to increase as a fast and cost-efficient method of garnering information covering large geographical regions and populations. Furthermore those numbers are likely to be utilized by policy makers designing large-scale, expensive and often irreversible, hard and soft interventions in social-ecological systems (‘adaptations’). An appreciation of the effect of values on the reliability of the numbers (information) being examined is essential, to avoid catastrophic ‘maladaptations’. The communication model implemented above provides a valuable framework, or lens, through which to view the potential sources of bias brought about by values and indeed other factors during the number collection process. Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank the staff and students at Can Tho University, Vietnam for their support in the field. References and Notes
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sciforum-005027 | Human Communication and Cooperation from an Evolutionary Perspective | N/A |
Show Abstract |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There is a strong connection between human communication and cooperation on a conceptual as well as in evolutionary history (2,5). Most animal species communicate with signals that evolved over time and are used in only very limited contexts with very little voluntary control over their production. Human communication on the other hand is very flexible but also inherently ambiguous. To resolve this ambiguity humans rely on their advanced socio-cognitive abilities as well as expectations about mutual cooperativeness (3,4). In a similar way, many animal species cooperate in very sophisticated ways but human forms of cooperation are unique in their scale and flexibility. In order to coordinate their behavior during cooperative activities, humans rely heavily on communication (1). In my talk, I will present several comparative studies with great apes and human children to provide an empirical basis on which we can evaluate claims about human uniqueness and reconstruct the evolution of the abilities in question. The results of these studies show that apes show an impressive flexibility in their abilities to communicate and cooperate with others. However, there seem to be several informative limitations. Great apes use communication mainly to achieve their own goals and do not interpret or produce communicative signals in a cooperative way. Furthermore, cooperative activities tend to break down in situations in which their maintenance depends on dividing the spoils of the activity equally or providing others with relevant information. The strong connection between communication and cooperation in humans might be explained by a certain set of cognitive abilities, namely the ability to represent social interaction as joint activities with shared goals and intentions. References and Notes
|
About This Conference
Conference Schedule
Travel & Registration Information
Please refer to the official ISIS Summit page for travel and accommodation information. Below is the list of available registration rates. Please use the registration form to register with the ISIS Summit Vienna 2015.
- Early Bird academics: 400.00 EUR
- Regular academics: 500.00 EUR
- Early Bird non-academics: 530.00 EUR
- Regular non-academics: 700.00 EUR
- Students: 120.00 EUR
- Retired persons: 120.00 EUR
- Unemployed: 120.00 EUR
- Persons with special needs: 120.00 EUR
- Citizens of BRICS, newly independent countries, developing countries: 120.00 EUR
- ISIS members (special offer): 120.00 EUR
- Early Bird ISIS member: 120.00 EUR
- Early Bird DTMD workshop participant with presentation: 120.00 EUR
- Early Bird FIS group mailing list member: 120.00 EUR
- Early Bird ICTs-and-Society Network member: 120.00 EUR
- Early Bird International Center for Philosophy of Information affiliate: 120.00 EUR
- Early Bird B.S.Lab affiliate: 320.00 EUR
- Early Bird BCSSS member: 320.00 EUR
- Early Bird Communications Engineering (University of Linz) co-worker: 320.00 EUR
- Early Bird Department of Communication (University of Vienna) co-worker: 320.00 EUR
- Early Bird Department of Systems Analysis (University of Economics Prague) co-worker: 320.00 EUR
- Early Bird Global Brain Institute affiliate: 320.00 EUR
- Early Bird IACAP member: 320.00 EUR
- Early Bird IANES affiliate: 320.00 EUR
- Early Bird ICIE member: 320.00 EUR
- Early Bird Institut für Design Science München member: 320.00 EUR
- Early Bird Institute for Sustainable Economic Development (BOKU) co-worker: 320.00 EUR
- Early Bird ISA member: 320.00 EUR
- Early Bird ISBS member: 320.00 EUR
- Early Bird ITA (OAW) co-worker: 320.00 EUR
- Early Bird ITHEA member: 320.00 EUR
- Early Bird KHG member: 320.00 EUR
- Early Bird Leibniz-Sozietät member: 320.00 EUR
- Early Bird Media, Technology & Research Group affiliate: 320.00 EUR
- Early Bird Moscow Conservatory affiliate: 320.00 EUR
- Early Bird OCG member: 320.00 EUR
- Early Bird SFU co-worker: 320.00 EUR
- Early Bird Szeged Information History Workshop affiliate: 320.00 EUR
- Early Bird FIfF member: 320.00 EUR
- Invited speaker, chair, convenor, moderator, curator: 0.00 EUR
- Staff: 0.00 EUR
- Press: 0.00 EUR
- Sponsored: 0.00 EUR
- TU Wien course student: 0.00 EUR
- Accompanying participant: 200.00 EUR
- I intend to take part in the eve reception on 3 June 2015 in Vienna: 0.00 EUR
- I intend to take part in the social dinner at the floating Summit on 7 June 2015: 0.00 EUR
Call for Participation
I. Invited Speech
Session Chair
Dr. Wolfgang Hofkirchner
S1. Conference Stream DTMD 2015
Chair of the stream: David Chapman. Please see the Instructions for Authors for a template, instructions for preparation and information on the submission of extended abstracts.
Session Chair
Dr. David Chapman
Show all published submissions (8) Hide published submissions (8)
Submissions
List of Papers (8) Toggle list
S2. Conference Stream ICPI 2015
Chair of the stream: Joseph Brenner. Please see the Instructions for Authors for a template, instructions for preparation and information on the submission of extended abstracts.
Session Chair
Dr. Joseph Brenner, International Center for Transdisciplinary Research, Paris
S3. Conference Stream ICTS 2015
Chair of the stream: Christian Fuchs. Please see the Instructions for Authors for a template, instructions for preparation and information on the submission of extended abstracts.
Session Chair
Dr. Christian Fuchs
T1. Conference Track: (Big) history of information
Session Chair
Dr. László Z. Karvalics
T1.0.1. Conference Track: Andrew Feenberg's technical politics and ICTs
Session Chair
Professor Graeme Kirkpatrick
T1.1. Conference Track: As we may teach
Chair of the stream: Kristof Fenyvesi. Please see the Instructions for Authors for a template, instructions for preparation and information on the submission of extended abstracts.
Session Chair
Dr. Kristof Fenyvesi, University of Jyväskylä
T1.2. Conference Track: China and the global information society
Session Chair
Dr. Robert Bichler
T1.3. Conference Track: Communication, information and reporting
Session Chair
Dr. Gandolfo Dominici
T1.4. Conference Track: Cyberpeace
Session Chair
Dr. Kai Nothdurft
T2. Conference Track: Emancipation or disempowerment of man?
Session Chair
Dr. Tomáš Sigmund
T2.1. Conference Track: Emergence of and in (self-)organizing work systems
Session Chair
Dr. Christian Stary
T2.2. Conference Track: Emergent systems, information and society
Session Chair
Dr. Wolfgang Hofkirchner
T3. Conference Track: Empowering patients
Chair of the stream: Mary Jo Deering. Please see the Instructions for Authors for a template, instructions for preparation and information on the submission of extended abstracts.
Session Chair
Dr. Mary Jo Deering
T3.0. Conference Track: Homo informaticus
T3.1. Conference Track: Human resilience and human vulnerability
Session Chair
Dr. Brigitte Sindelar
Show all published submissions (1) Hide published submissions (1)
Submissions
List of Papers (1) Toggle list
T3.2. Conference Track: ICT and literature
Session Chair
Mr. Giovanna Di Rosario
Show all accepted abstracts (1) Hide accepted abstracts (1)
List of Accepted Abstracts (1) Toggle list
T3.3. Conference Track: ICTs and power relations
Session Chair
Mr. Stefan Strauß
T4. Conference Track: Information in the exact sciences and symmetry
Chair of the stream: Gyorgy Darvas. Please see the Instructions for Authors for a template, instructions for preparation and information on the submission of extended abstracts.
Session Chair
Dr. György Darvas, IRO Hungarian Academy of Sciences; and the Symmetrion
T5. Conference Track: Informational warfare
Chair of the stream: Mariarosaria Taddeo. Please see the Instructions for Authors for a template, instructions for preparation and information on the submission of extended abstracts.
Session Chair
Dr. Mariarosaria Taddeo
T6. Conference Track: Multi-level semiosis
Chair of the stream: Luis Emilio Bruni. Please see the Instructions for Authors for a template, instructions for preparation and information on the submission of extended abstracts.
Session Chair
Dr. Luis Emilio Bruni
T7. Conference Track: Music, information and symmetry
Session Chair
Dr. Konstantin Zenkin
T7.1. Conference Track: Natural disasters
Session Chair
Dr. Marianne Penker
T7.2. Conference Track: Progress in Information Studies in China
Session Chair
Professor Xue-Shan Yan, Peking University
T8. Conference Track: Searching to create a humanized civilization
Chair of the stream: Elohim Jimenez-Lopez. Please see the Instructions for Authors for a template, instructions for preparation and information on the submission of extended abstracts.
Session Chair
Dr. Elohim Jimenez Lopez
Show all accepted abstracts (1) Hide accepted abstracts (1)
List of Accepted Abstracts (1) Toggle list
T8.1. Conference Track: The ethics of foundations
Session Chair
Professor Rainer E. Zimmermann, Lehrgebiet Philosophie
T9. Conference Track: The Global Brain
Chair of the stream: David R. Weinbaum. Please see the Instructions for Authors for a template, instructions for preparation and information on the submission of extended abstracts.
Session Chair
Dr. David R. Weinbaum (Weaver)
T9.1. Conference Track: Transdisciplinary response and responsibility
Session Chair
Dr. Søren Brier
T9.2. Conference Track: Triangular relationship
Chair of the stream: Marcin J. Schröder. Please see the Instructions for Authors for a template, instructions for preparation and information on the submission of extended abstracts.
Session Chair
Dr. Marcin Jan Schroeder, Akita International University
T9.3. Conference Track: Weaving the understanding of information
Session Chair
Dr. José María Díaz Nafría