Please login first
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas   Dr.  Institute, Department or Faculty Head 
Timeline See timeline
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas published an article in March 2019.
Top co-authors See all
Timon Rabczuk

171 shared publications

Department of Computer Engineering, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia

Florentin Smarandache

159 shared publications

University of New Mexico, USA

Shankar Chakraborty

124 shared publications

Department of Production Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India

A. Kaklauskas

110 shared publications

Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania

Andry Rakotonirainy

102 shared publications

Centre for Accident Research & Road Safety Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

Publication Record
Distribution of Articles published per year 
(2008 - 2019)
Total number of journals
published in
Publications See all
Article 0 Reads 0 Citations A Bipolar Fuzzy Extension of the MULTIMOORA Method Dragisa Stanujkic, Darjan Karabasevic, Edmundas Kazimieras Z... Published: 19 March 2019
Informatica, doi: 10.15388/informatica.2018.201
DOI See at publisher website
Article 0 Reads 0 Citations Application of MCDM Methods in Sustainability Engineering: A Literature Review 2008–2018 Mirko Stojčić, Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, Dragan Pamučar... Published: 08 March 2019
Symmetry, doi: 10.3390/sym11030350
DOI See at publisher website ABS Show/hide abstract
Sustainability is one of the main challenges of the recent decades. In this regard, several prior studies have used different techniques and approaches for solving this problem in the field of sustainability engineering. Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) is an important technique that presents a systematic approach for helping decisionmakers in this field. The main goal of this paper is to review the literature concerning the application of MCDM methods in the field of sustainable engineering. The Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection Database was chosen to identify 108 papers in the period of 2008–2018. The selected papers were classified into five categories, including construction and infrastructure, supply chains, transport and logistics, energy, and other. In addition, the articles were classified based on author, year, application area, study objective and problem, applied methods, number of published papers, and name of the journal. The results of this paper show that sustainable engineering is an area that is quite suitable for the use of MCDM. It can be concluded that most of the methods used in sustainable engineering are based on traditional approaches with a noticeable trend towards applying the theory of uncertainty, such as fuzzy, grey, rough, and neutrosophic theory.
Article 0 Reads 0 Citations A New Hybrid MCDM Model: Sustainable Supplier Selection in a Construction Company Bojan Matić, Stanislav Jovanović, Dillip Kumar Das, Edmundas... Published: 08 March 2019
Symmetry, doi: 10.3390/sym11030353
DOI See at publisher website ABS Show/hide abstract
Sustainable development is one of the most important preconditions for preserving resources and balanced functioning of a complete supply chain in different areas. Taking into account the complexity of sustainable development and a supply chain, different decisions have to be made day-to-day, requiring the consideration of different parameters. One of the most important decisions in a sustainable supply chain is the selection of a sustainable supplier and, often the applied methodology is multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM). In this paper, a new hybrid MCDM model for evaluating and selecting suppliers in a sustainable supply chain for a construction company has been developed. The evaluation and selection of suppliers have been carried out on the basis of 21 criteria that belong to all aspects of sustainability. The determination of the weight values of criteria has been performed applying the full consistency method (FUCOM), while a new rough complex proportional assessment (COPRAS) method has been developed to evaluate the alternatives. The rough Dombi aggregator has been used for averaging in group decision-making while evaluating the significance of criteria and assessing the alternatives. The obtained results have been checked and confirmed using a sensitivity analysis that implies a four-phase procedure. In the first phase, the change of criteria weight was performed, while, in the second phase, rough additive ratio assessment (ARAS), rough weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS), rough simple additive weighting (SAW), and rough multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC) have been applied. The third phase involves changing the parameter ρ in the modeling of rough Dombi aggregator, and the fourth phase includes the calculation of Spearman’s correlation coefficient (SCC) that shows a high correlation of ranks.
Article 0 Reads 0 Citations An improved fuzzy MULTIMOORA approach for multi-criteria decision making based on objective weighting method (CCSD) and ... J. Heidary Dahooie, E.K. Zavadskas, H.R. Firoozfar, A.S. Van... Published: 01 March 2019
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2018.12.008
DOI See at publisher website
Article 0 Reads 0 Citations Assessment of concentrated solar power (CSP) technologies based on a modified intuitionistic fuzzy topsis and trigonomet... Fausto Cavallaro, Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, Dalia Strei... Published: 01 March 2019
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.009
DOI See at publisher website
Article 0 Reads 0 Citations An approach to determining customer satisfaction in traditional Serbian restaurants Dragisa Stanujkic, Darjan Karabasevic, Edmundas Kazimieras Z... Published: 01 March 2019
Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, doi: 10.9770/jesi.2019.6.3(5)
DOI See at publisher website