Please login first
Valentinas Podvezko   Dr.  Senior Scientist or Principal Investigator 
Timeline See timeline
Valentinas Podvezko published an article in March 2016.
Top co-authors
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas

107 shared publications

Institute of Sustainable Construction, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, Vilnius LT-10223, Lithuania

Askoldas Podviezko

26 shared publications

Department of Economics Engineering, Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania

Sigitas Mitkus

13 shared publications

Vilnius Gediminas Technical University

Eva Trinkūniene

1 shared publications

Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania

3
Publications
17
Reads
3
Downloads
38
Citations
Publication Record
Distribution of Articles published per year 
(2010 - 2016)
Total number of journals
published in
 
3
 
Publications
Article 4 Reads 4 Citations Operating Characteristics Analysis of Rotor Systems Using MCDM Methods Audrius Čereška1, Valentinas Podvezko, Edmundas Kazimieras Z... Published: 05 March 2016
Studies in Informatics and Control, doi: 10.24846/v25i1y201607
DOI See at publisher website
CONFERENCE-ARTICLE 9 Reads 0 Citations Evaluation of Level of Heterogeneity of Socio-Economic Development of a Country Valentinas Podvezko, Askoldas Podviezko Published: 31 October 2014
The 4th World Sustainability Forum, doi: 10.3390/wsf-4-d006
DOI See at publisher website ABS Show/hide abstract
Heterogeneity of levels of socio-economic development of countries or country's different regions is undesirable. For the sake of sustainable development of a country or group of countries it is important to elicit relative levels of development of country's regions or different countries, and to find the weakest indicators of their development. Socio-economic development of a country or group of countries depends on a variety of factors. Statistics Department of Lithuania provides annual data describing the state of all 10 counties of Lithuania by 162 criteria. 60 criteria describe economic development, 94 describe social development, and finally, ecological state is described by 8 criteria. Prevailing in literature comparative analysis by separately selected criteria, as important as GDP per capita, often does not provide an extensive picture of quality of life of country's citizens. A comprehensive approach is required for evaluating of level of development of countries or country's regions. A suitable tool, which promptly provides quantitative evaluation of level of development of country's regions, provides results in a clear comprehensible form, and comprises the whole variety of important multi-dimensional criteria is multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. Experienced experts evaluate weights of importance of criteria used in the research, keeping in mind the major aim of the evaluation. Weights and values of criteria are comprised into a single cumulative criterion of a MCDA method. Comparative analysis of evaluation over a lengthy period of time allows to analyse dynamics of development of the regions, and to elicit levels of dependence of different criteria on the general level of development and welfare. MCDM methods allow revealing weaknesses of development of every region and provide a strong support for decision-makers and politicians for their effective actions intended for sustainable development of regions.
Article 4 Reads 34 Citations COMPLEX EVALUATION OF CONTRACTS FOR CONSTRUCTION Valentinas Podvezko, Sigitas Mitkus, Eva Trinkūniene Published: 30 June 2010
Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, doi: 10.3846/jcem.2010.33
DOI See at publisher website ABS Show/hide abstract
The effectiveness of construction processes largely depends on the effective contract preparation. To draw an effective contract for construction, the methods of assessment and comparison of these types of contract should be developed. In recent years, multicriteria methods have been widely used for evaluating various complex phenomena. The development of construction evaluation methods requires the analysis of construction technology and organization, as well as economic factors and legal aspects of contracting in construction. In the present investigation, the criteria describing contracts for construction from various perspectives are determined based on the estimates elicited from experts. The weights of nine criteria used in complex evaluation of construction contracts are determined based on the use of the AHP method. The consistency of expert estimates is also assessed. Using multicriteria evaluation methods, construction contracts are compared and the best alternative is determined. Santrauka Didele reikšme statybos proceso efektyvumui turi tinkamas statybos rangos sutarties sudarymas. Siekiant sudaryti efektyvias statybos rangos sutartis, reikia sukurti rangos sutarčiu ivertinimo ir palyginimo metodikas. Pastaruoju metu sudetingiems procesams vertinti plačiai taikomi daugiakriteriniai vertinimo metodai. Ju vertinimas priklauso nuo rodikliu, charakterizuojančiu procesa, ir ju reikšmingumo. Siekiant parengti statybos vertinimo metodikas, reikia išnagrineti ne tik techninius, organizacinius, ekonominius, bet ir teisinius statybos rangos sutarties aspektus. Taikant ekspertu vertinimus, buvo nustatyti rodikliai, charakterizuojantys statybos rangos sutarties turini. Kompleksiškai ivertinant statybos rangos sutartis AHP metodu nustatyti devyniu rodikliu svoriai, ivertintas ekspertu nuomoniu suderinamumas. Taikant daugia‐kriterinius metodus tarpusavyje palygintos statybos rangos sutartys ir nustatytas geriausias variantas.
Top