Please login first
S. M. S. Mahmoudi   Dr.  University Lecturer 
Timeline See timeline
S. M. S. Mahmoudi published an article in May 2018.
Top co-authors See all
M.A. Rosen

249 shared publications

Majid Amidpour

94 shared publications

Mortaza Yari

55 shared publications

University of Mohaghegh Ardabili

A. Rahimi

47 shared publications

Ali Saberi Mehr

25 shared publications

71
Publications
13
Reads
0
Downloads
81
Citations
Publication Record
Distribution of Articles published per year 
(2008 - 2018)
Total number of journals
published in
 
22
 
Publications See all
Article 1 Read 0 Citations Thermodynamic assessment of a novel SOFC based CCHP system in a wastewater treatment plant A.S. Mehr, M. MosayebNezhad, A. Lanzini, M. Yari, S.M.S. Mah... Published: 01 May 2018
Energy, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.102
DOI See at publisher website
ABS Show/hide abstract
Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTP) have a significant role in both processing wastewaters to return to the water cycle and in transforming between 40% and 60% of the dissolved organic matter into a non-fossil combustible gas (biogas) with a methane content of around 50–70 vol %. Significant energy cost savings can be achieved using combined cooling, heat and power (CCHP) systems in small-scale distributed power system wastewater treatment plants. In this study, feasibility of a trigeneration system in a real wastewater treatment plant is studied. A mathematical model has been developed to evaluate system performance from the thermodynamics point of view. Based on the simulation results, fuel consumption, power production, and thermal efficiency of the system were analyzed. For the proposed configuration, the electricity coverage is increased by 27% and the produced cooling load of around 20 kW in summer season is obtained. The results also reveal that integration of the trilateral cycle (TLC) and the absorption chiller system in the reference WWTP offers a 17.2% more efficient plant from the viewpoint of first law efficiency.
Article 1 Read 0 Citations Exergoeconomic analysis of natural gas fired and biomass post-fired combined cycle with hydrogen injection into the comb... Anahita Moharamian, Saeed Soltani, Marc A. Rosen, S.M.S. Mah... Published: 01 April 2018
Journal of Cleaner Production, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.156
DOI See at publisher website
Article 1 Read 1 Citation Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a novel combined power and ejector refrigeration cycle – Desalination system Mohsen Sadeghi, Mortaza Yari, S.M.S. Mahmoudi, Moharram Jafa... Published: 01 December 2017
Applied Energy, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.047
DOI See at publisher website
Article 0 Reads 0 Citations Exergoeconomic and thermodynamic analyses of an externally fired combined cycle with hydrogen production and injection t... Anahita Moharamian, Saeed Soltani, Marc A. Rosen, S.M.S. Mah... Published: 01 December 2017
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.11.136
DOI See at publisher website
ABS Show/hide abstract
A hydrogen production unit is successfully integrated with an externally fired combined cycle using biomass fuel. The hydrogen produced in an electrolyzer can be used for other purposes, but when there is temporarily no market for it is injected into the combustion chamber of an externally fired combined cycle. Injecting hydrogen into the combustion chamber was found to reduce fuel consumption by almost 27%. Moreover, hydrogen injection decreased the energy efficiency and exergy efficiency by 45%, and decreased both the exergy loss and exergy destruction rates. Meanwhile, CO2 emissions decreased by 32%. However, there are some disadvantages to hydrogen injection, especially from the viewpoint of exergoeconomics. The total unit product cost for the externally fired combined cycle with hydrogen injection is almost 27% more than the unit without hydrogen injection, although the exergy loss and destruction costs decreased with hydrogen injection. The value of the relative cost difference with hydrogen injection rises by 40%. Also the exergoeconomic assessment demonstrates that the cost of components (purchase and maintenance) are higher than cost of components' exergy destruction for both cycles, i.e., with and without hydrogen injection. As the compressor pressure ratio increases, optimal points are identified for biomass flow rate, energy and exergy efficiencies, exergy destruction and loss rates, exergy destruction and loss exergy cost rates, total unit product cost and relative cost difference.
Article 0 Reads 0 Citations Advanced exergy analysis for an anode gas recirculation solid oxide fuel cell S.M.S. Mahmoudi, M. Yari, M. Fallah Published: 01 December 2017
Energy, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.10.003
DOI See at publisher website
Article 0 Reads 0 Citations A comparative thermoeconomic evaluation of three biomass and biomass-natural gas fired combined cycles using organic Ran... Anahita Moharamian, Saeed Soltani, Marc A. Rosen, S.M.S. Mah... Published: 01 September 2017
Journal of Cleaner Production, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.174
DOI See at publisher website