
Date: 18 June 2026
Time: 2:30 p.m. CEST | 8:30 a.m. EDT | 8:30 p.m. CST Asia
Webinar ID: 858 1488 8778
Webinar Secretariat: journal.webinar@mdpi.com

Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, Italy;Maria De Nobili is EiC of the section Soil Conservation and Sustainability for the MDPI journal Sustainability. She has recently retired from the position of Full Professor of Soil Science at the University of Udine where she lead the Environmental Functionality of Soils group, but she is still involved in active research. Current research interests include redox state of soil organic matter components and amelioration of saline soils by organic amendments.
School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University, UK;As an Emeritus Professor of Political Thought, he is a part-time Senior Research Investigator responsible for supervising doctoral students and conducting research. His current research interest is in marine governance with a particular focus on fisheries management.
Department of Architecture, University of Naples Federico II, Italy;Dr. Federico Minelli, PhD, conducts research on building energy performance, HVAC systems, renewable energy integration, net-zero and zero-emission buildings, and multi-criteria decision-making methods for sustainable energy and building design. He has authored several scientific publications in the field of building physics and energy systems and actively contributes to international journals as a reviewer and other editorial roles.
In this section, you will find the recordings of this webinar to watch, re-watch and share with your colleagues!
Discussion started by chair sharing her insights to the importance of the review process and she thanked speakers for the presentations. Chair made sure that questions are in scope of the webinar as we received some questions completely out of scope and speakers couldn't respond to them (don't remember now exact questions but more general questions in sustainability/environment scope); Some questions I needed to take over from editorial side - such as how we choose the SI topics and why papers were desk-rejected (in this case out of scope...), there were few questions from authors some technical things like number of words before submitting, or formatting, etc.
We discussed the time period allowed to reviewers and in general importance of the rigorous peer-review as well how important is reviewing the papers from scholars' side and science in general. Chair and speakers also engaged and ask each other some questions/shared experience.