Please login first
Citizen science in the East Pacific marine realm: Bivalves under scrutiny
* , ,
1  Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Experimental, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina;
2  Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina.
Academic Editor: Gioele Capillo

Published: 14 October 2024 by MDPI in The 3rd International Electronic Conference on Diversity session Marine Diversity
Abstract:

The growth of citizen science has revolutionized the knowledge of biological diversity worldwide, improving the knowledge on the species diversity for particular areas and improving the accuracy of known distributional ranges of the species. This study evaluates the current impact of the iNaturalist platform on understanding marine bivalve diversity along the East Pacific coast, from Alaska (71.39°N) to Cape Horn (54.86°S).

All marine bivalve observations along the East Pacific coast (to mid-June 2024) were obtained from the iNaturalist platform. The geographic coverage of these observations, and the accuracy of this set of information, was evaluated, and this information was contrasted with the total diversity currently known about in this area.

At the time of this analysis, a total of 77,207 marine bivalve observations, comprising 572 species and 62 families, was available in iNaturalist. This represents 45.0% of the total number of species and 77.5% of the total number of families known to the area. Most of these observations (80.5%) come from North America, followed by Central America (14.8%), and only 4.7% come from South America. The greater number of these observations (76.7%) appears to be identified at the species level, while the remaining observations refer to a higher taxonomic level (e.g. Genus, Family, or even Class). Observation quality was categorized as follows: 57.7% as "Research Grade", 41.2% as "Needs ID", and 1.1% as "Casual".

Despite the great number of observations of marine bivalves currently available in iNaturalist, the coverage of this platform is still limited. This phenomenon is registered both at a geographic scale, particularly in the case of South America, and a diversity scale, with more than a half of the known species not yet documented therein.

Keywords: Mollusca; Bivalvia; Diversity; East Pacific Ocean
Comments on this paper
Laura Schejter
These results are very interesting, taking bivalves as a case study! What would be the proposed future work? Why do you think South America has the lowest contribution to this type of study? Is it due to a lack of dissemination of platforms like iNaturalist, fear of sharing observation records, or a lack of specialists or naturalists?
Maria de Kemmeter
The lower contribution of observations from South America compared to North America can likely be attributed to a combination of factors. In North America, particularly in the U.S., there’s a higher population density along the Pacific coast, which facilitates greater participation in platforms like iNaturalist. In contrast, South America, despite having coastal regions like Chile, has a smaller population. Additionally, science citizen platforms are more popular in the U.S. due to a stronger culture of public engagement in scientific projects, whereas such platforms are still growing in popularity in South America. Also, the disparity may also reflect the overall effort in data collection and the availability of local specialists or naturalists to promote participation.



 
 
Top