Please login first
Influence of Packaging Materials on the Quality Evolution of Extra Virgin Olive Oil Under Simulated Household Storage and Use Conditions
* , , , , , , , , , , ,
1  Department of Agriculture, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, 06126 Perugia, Italy
Academic Editor: Elsa Gonçalves

Abstract:

Oxidative degradation compromises the sensory, healthy, and commercial value of extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) by depleting antioxidants and producing undesirable off-flavour compounds. Therefore, selecting appropriate primary packaging materials is crucial for preserving the shelf life and overall quality of EVOO. This comparative study evaluated the influence of three packaging materials on the physicochemical and sensory properties of EVOO under conditions simulating typical household storage and use. The same EVOO was stored in polyethylene terephthalate (PET), bag-in-box (BB), and chrome-plated tin (CPT) containers (3 L) and exposed to 25°C under a 12-hour light/dark cycle. To mimic household consumption, 75 mL of EVOO was withdrawn daily and collected over 40 days. Every 10 days, legal quality parameters (free acidity, peroxide value (PV), K232, and K270), phenolic and volatile compounds, as well as sensory attributes of EVOOs, were monitored. The type of packaging material significantly affected the oxidative stability and overall quality of the EVOO during household consumption. Free acidity, K232, and K270 slightly increased across all containers, while PET exhibited a significant rise in peroxide value, exceeding regulatory limits. In addition, EVOO stored in the PET container experienced losses of 44% in α-tocopherol and 26% in total hydrophilic phenols. In contrast, there were only 1% and 11% reductions for EVOOs stored in BB and CPT containers, respectively. A significant decline in C5-C6 aldehydes and C6 esters, associated with the “green” attributes of EVOOs, occurred for PET-packaged EVOOs compared to BB and CPT, with a higher accumulation of C7-C9 aldehydes and 3-methyl-1-butanol, which are responsible for rancid and winey–vinegary defects, respectively. Among the three packaging materials tested, PET offered lower protection against oxidation than BB or CPT. The EVOOs stored in BB and CPT retained more antioxidants, developed fewer off-flavour compounds, and maintained the oil’s compliance with extra virgin standards.

Keywords: extra-virgin olive oil; packaging; shelf life; quality parameters; antioxidants; phenolic compounds; volatile compounds; sensory analysis
Comments on this paper
Currently there are no comments available.


 
 
Top