EventsThe 1st International Electronic Conference on Medicine
Published
with-doi10.3390/IECMD2021-10313 (registering DOI)
This submission belongs to the session 2. Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine of the event The 1st International Electronic Conference on Medicine
Published date
21 Jun, 2021
Academic Editor
author-avatarAllison Reiss
Citation
Agnete Teivane, Kristaps Jurjāns, Krista Lazdovska, Evija Miglāne, Ainārs Rudzītis, Artūrs Balodis, Five Year Follow-Up of Cryptogenic Stroke Patients Following Pfo Closure, in Proceedings of The 1st International Electronic Conference on Medicine, 20 June–30 June 2021, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland, doi: 10.3390/IECMD2021-10313
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Five Year Follow-Up of Cryptogenic Stroke Patients Following Pfo Closure

Krista Lazdovska 2
Ainārs Rudzītis 4
1. Med. student, Latvia
2. Dr.med
3. Assoc. Prof.
4. Dr. med
Abstract

Background and Objectives: According to guidelines PFO closure is recommended for secondary stroke prevention in patients with cryptogenic stroke [1]. Paradoxial embolism from PFO mediated right to left shunt has been described as the mechanism of stroke in these cases [2]. The aim of the study is to follow-up patients after PFO closure and determine the long-term effectiveness on reccurent stroke risk reduction. Materials and Methods: A total of 103 patients were enrolled in a retrospective study and followed-up by phone up to five years after PFO closure. Standardized survey was conducted about their well-being, recurrent cerebrovascular events, and the use of prescribed medication. Patients were also followed up for residual shunts 24 h, 30 days, 1 and 2 years after PFO. The pathogenic ischemic stroke subtypes are determined using CCS (Causative Classification System for Ischemic Stroke). Results: 43.7% (n = 45) of patients were male. The mean age – 44.4 ± 13 (18–75). 53.4% (n = 55) of patients with possible cardio-aortic embolism the most probable cause for cryptogenic stroke was PFO. Residual shunts were mostly observed in patients with Amplatzer occluder – 87.5% (n = 14). There was correlation between residual shunt and increased risk of transient ischemic attack recurrence (p = 0.067). Five-years after PFO closure recurrent cerebrovascular events were reported in only 5.1% (n = 5) of patients, this difference is statistically relevant (p < 0.001). Out of 51 patient presented with complaints before PFO closure, 25.5% (n = 13) did not present with any complaints after PFO closure. Conclusions: PFO can be considered a possible risk factor for cryptogenic stroke. PFO closure is effective in reducing recurrent cerebrovascular events. Residual shunt after PFO closure increases the risk of transient ischemic attack recurrence. Amplatzer occluder device is associated with a higher risk for residual shunts after PFO closure. PFO closure can be associated with improvement of complaints.

Keywords
patent foramen ovale
patent foramen ovale closure
cryptogenic stroke
paradoxical embolism
recurrent stroke
secondary stroke prevention
Manuscript
Diagnosis of Psychosocial Risk Determinants and the Prioritization of Organizational Intervention Objects Among Medical Occupational Groups in a Public Healthcare
Institution
The association of the cardiovascular disease with the T3111C polymorphism in the CLOCK gene