EventsThe 2nd International Electronic Conference on Animals - Global Sustainability and Animals: Welfare, Policies and Technologies
Published
with-doi10.3390/IECA2021-12024 (registering DOI)
This submission belongs to the session A. Climate change and effects on the sustainability of animal systems of the event The 2nd International Electronic Conference on Animals - Global Sustainability and Animals: Welfare, Policies and Technologies
Published date
02 Dec, 2021
Academic Editor
author-avatarAndrea Pezzuolo
Citation
Matheus Deniz, Karolini Tenffen de Sousa, Marcos Martinez do Vale, João Ricardo Dittrich, João Ari Hill, Maria José Hötzel, Silvopastoral systems as a sustainable alternative to mitigate the effects of climate change on farm level , in Proceedings of The 2nd International Electronic Conference on Animals - Global Sustainability and Animals: Welfare, Policies and Technologies, 29 November–13 December 2021, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland, doi: 10.3390/IECA2021-12024
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Silvopastoral systems as a sustainable alternative to mitigate the effects of climate change on farm level

image
image
João Ricardo Dittrich 1
João Ari Hill 2
1. Laboratório de Inovações Tecnológicas em Zootecnia (LITEZ), Universidade Federal do Paraná
2. Estação de Pesquisa Agroecológica CPRA, Instituto de Desenvolvimento Rural do Paraná
3. Laboratório de Etologia Aplicada e Bem-Estar Animal (LETA), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
Abstract

Climate changes cause an increase in the duration and intensity of heatwaves and promotes a decrease in the time that cattle remain in thermal comfort zones. Silvopastoral systems can be considered a nature-based solution to mitigate the effects of climate change. The aim of this study was to estimate the thermal comfort of bovines during hot seasons (spring and summer) in a silvopastoral system compared to treeless pasture. The experiment was carried out between September of 2020 and February of 2021 in southern Brazil. Two pasture systems were evaluated (4 non-consecutive days per month): treeless pasture (TLP) and silvopastoral system (SPS) with trees along the border fences. Two sets of autonomous sensors were located in each system (TLP - center of the paddock and SPS - full sun and 2 m away from the trees), to measured microclimate variables used to calculate the bioclimatic indicators of black globe-humidity index (BGHI), radiant thermal load (RTL), and heat load index (HLI). All data were analyzed using a mixed model with days and hours as random effects using the statistical software R. There was an influence of the system (p<0.001) on the bioclimatic indicators. On average the SPS was ~80% (p<0.001) more likely to present lower values of bioclimatic indicators than the TLP. The average values of all bioclimatic indicators differed (p<0.001) between the systems; TLP: BGHI = ~78; RTL = ~581, and HLI = ~59; SPS: BGHI = ~72; RTL = ~439, and HLI = ~47. In TLP all bioclimatic indicators were above the threshold for heat stress for bovines, promoting a challenge thermal environment for pasture-based production. In conclusion, the SPS provided a better thermal environment for pasture-based systems when compared to TLP, indicating that it can mitigate the effects of heat during the spring and summer of subtropical climate.

Keywords
Heat abatement
Thermal comfort
Wood pasture
Poster
Deniz_etal_Presentation.pdf
Application of Biological Aerated Filters For Treating Cattle Abattoir Wastewater
Review of Factors Influencing Local Beef Production in Malaysia