Events1st International Online Conference on Agriculture - Advances in Agricultural Science and Technology
Published
This submission belongs to the session 3. Delivering Genetic Gains through Breeding with Appropriate Genotype Evaluation of the event 1st International Online Conference on Agriculture - Advances in Agricultural Science and Technology
Published date
10 Feb, 2022
Academic Editor
author-avatarRodomiro Ortiz
Citation
Alina Sandra Puig, Brian Irish, Tomás Ayala-Silva, Sarah Wurzel, Osman Gutierrez, Effect of cacao black pod rot screening method on disease resistance determination, in Proceedings of 1st International Online Conference on Agriculture - Advances in Agricultural Science and Technology, 10 February–25 February 2022, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland, doi: 10.3390/IOCAG2022-12215
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Effect of cacao black pod rot screening method on disease resistance determination

image
Tomás Ayala-Silva 3
1. Foreign Disease-Weed Science Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Fort Detrick, MD 21702 USA, USA
2. Plant Germplasm Introduction and Testing Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Prosser, WA 99350 USA
3. Tropical Agriculture Research Station, USDA-ARS, Mayaguez, PR 00680 USA
4. Subtropical Horticultural Research Station, USDA-ARS, Miami FL 33158 USA
Abstract

Black pod rot, caused by several species of Phytophthora, is responsible for greater losses than any other disease affecting cacao. Due to the widespread distribution of this disease, the development of resistant germplasm would benefit farmers around the globe. Breeders use various approaches to screen material for resistance to Phytophthora spp. These include calculating the incidence of infected pods in the field, and evaluating lesion development on pods and leaves following artificial inoculation. Due to significant variability, the method utilized for assessing disease resistance can influence conclusions. To determine how screening methods affect final disease resistance ratings, four cacao clones (BE 10, HY 271419, RIM 15 [MEX], and EET 236 [ECU]) were assessed using disease incidence calculated from field evaluations and lesion area seven days after inoculation (dai) of detached pod. Disease incidence differed significantly among clones (p<0.0007), ranging from 6.1% for BE 10 to 24.0% for HY 271419. RIM 15 [MEX] and EET 236 [ECU] were moderately susceptible with 10.3% and 21.9%, respectively. Differences among clones were also detected based on lesion area (p< 0.032), however, their relative ranking differed: BE 10 (53.9 cm2), HY 271419 (80.64cm2), RIM 15 [MEX] (95.7cm2), and EET 236 [ECU] (102.4cm2). This variation may be due to differences in the resistance component assessed by each method (pre- vs. post-penetration) or the inability to distinguish between diseases causing identical lesions in the field. The improved understanding of the how screening methods used can affect the disease resistance determination in cacao germplasm will benefit breeders and farmers.

Keywords
Theobroma cacao
black pod
disease resistance
phenotyping
Manuscript
Evaluation of Potential Ecological Risk Index of Toxic Metals Contamination in the Soils
Defensive Mutualism of Endophytic Fungi: Effects of Sphaeropsidin A against a Model Lepidopteran Pest