EventsThe 5th International Electronic Conference on Atmospheric Sciences
Published
with-doi10.3390/ecas2022-12876 (registering DOI)
This submission belongs to the session S7. Meteorology of the event The 5th International Electronic Conference on Atmospheric Sciences
Published date
22 Aug, 2022
Academic Editor
author-avatarAnthony Lupo
Citation
Pedro Manuel González, Adrian Luis Ferrer, Maibys Sierra, Comparison between 3DVAR and 3DEnVAR methods applied to SisPI for dense fog forecast, in Proceedings of The 5th International Electronic Conference on Atmospheric Sciences, 16 July–31 July 2022, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland, doi: 10.3390/ecas2022-12876
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Comparison between 3DVAR and 3DEnVAR methods applied to SisPI for dense fog forecast

1. Intitute of Meteorology, Cuba
2. Institute of Meteorology, Cuba
Abstract

The objective of this research is to evaluate and compare the impact of the 3DVAR and 3DEnVAR methods on short-term and very short-term fog forecasting, applied to Short-range Forecast System (SisPI). The experiments were developed using the initialization of 00:00 UTC on December 30th and 31th, 2019, where there was a continuous event of dense fog recorded in the region of Havana, Artemisa and Mayabeque. The research combines data related to conventional observations contained in prepbufr format, radiance information from microwave sensors available in bufr format, and observations from the KBYX and KBMA radars that include measurements of radial velocities and reflectivity, something that constitutes a novelty at the national level in relation to fog investigations in the country. As a whole, domain-dependent covariance matrices (BECs) are used, generated with the inclusion of hydrometeors as additional control variables. Given the high degree of subjectivity inherent in the registration of fog and haze in the conventional stations of the study area, the binary analysis uses the data of the present time code with the visibility predicted by the model, which is obtained through an empirical algorithm. The results suggest that the 3DVAR method leads to improve the CSI values by only 1% and the correct detections by 2%. These discrete values respond to a limited modification of the background field as a consequence of an inadequate dispersion of the impact of the observations on the domain. 3DEnVAR generates a more realistic analysis field compared to 3DVAR and achieves a more efficient spread of the impact of observations over the domain. The CSI values manage to be up to 17% higher than the runs without assimilation and 11% at 3DVAR.

Keywords
Fog
SisPI
Data Assimilation
Manuscript
Poster
ECAS_fog_assimilation_Cuba.pdf
Impact of COVID -19 Lockdown on the Air Quality in the Kullu Valley of Northwestern Himalaya, India
The structure of blizzard transport and heat costs of sublimation of ice crystals in blizzards on the surface of the Elbrus Mountain glacier