EventsOHOW 2022 – The 1st International Symposium on One Health, One World
Published
with-doi10.3390/ohow2022-13731 (registering DOI)
This submission belongs to the session S1. Urban Safety and Disaster Mitigation of the event OHOW 2022 – The 1st International Symposium on One Health, One World
Published date
22 Nov, 2022
Academic Editor
author-avatarWataru Takeuchi
Citation
Nussarin Sudrohman, Kuo-Chieh Chao, Suree Teerarungsigul, Evaluation of DFLOWZ and Debris-2D Models Using Road No. 1081 Km. 90 Data in Northern, Thailand, in Proceedings of OHOW 2022 – The 1st International Symposium on One Health, One World, Amari Pattaya Hotel, 8 December–10 December 2022, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland, doi: 10.3390/ohow2022-13731
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Evaluation of DFLOWZ and Debris-2D Models Using Road No. 1081 Km. 90 Data in Northern, Thailand

image
Suree Teerarungsigul 2
1. Department of Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Asian Institute of Technology
2. Geological Resources and Development, Department of Mineral Resources
Abstract

In northern Thailand, devastating landslides and debris flow frequently occur after heavy rainfalls. This study focused on the evaluation of debris flow using the DFLOWZ and Debris-2D models. The data collected from the failure at Santisuk-Bo Kluea (No. 1081) road on 27 July 2018 were used to validate the model results. The total debris flow volume that occurred at the Santisuk-Bo Kluea (No. 1081) road was estimated using the Digital Elevation Model (DEM) analysis. The actual deposition and affected areas were depicted using aerial photos to validate simulated deposition areas. As a result, it is indicated that the DFLOWZ model provides a better agreement compared to the actual deposited area. It was found that the differences in the deposition area and the overlapping deposition area obtained from the DFLOWZ model are 16% and 34%, respectively. For the Debris-2D model with the minimum yield stress of 8000 Pa, the differences in the deposition area and the overlapping deposition area are 51% and 16%, respectively. It should be noted that prudential input parameters should be selected with caution. Especially, the yield stress, which is the main factor for the Debris-2D model, should be obtained from the testing suggested by Liu and Huang (2006)

Keywords
Debris flow
DEM analysis
DFLOWZ model
Debris-2D model
One Health, One World  ― Toward the formation of the first hub of One Health, One world
Raising the Community’s Awareness of Disaster through the Board Games: A Review