EventsThe 4th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences
Published
This submission belongs to the session F. Energy, Environmental and Earth Science of the event The 4th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences
Published date
26 Oct, 2023
Academic Editor
author-avatarSimeone Chianese
Citation
Ali ilghami khosroshahi, Mohammad Bejani, Hadi Pourali, Arman Hosseinpour salehi, Comparing Regression Techniques for Temperature downscaling in Different Climate Classifications, in Proceedings of The 4th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences, 27 October–10 November 2023, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland, doi: 10.3390/ASEC2023-15256
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Comparing Regression Techniques for Temperature downscaling in Different Climate Classifications

1. Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran, Iran
Abstract

In recent years, downscaling techniques have emerged as practical methods in numerous fields, including climatology trend simulation. Therefore, identifying the optimal regression technique is critical for assessing, simulating, and predicting climate patterns. This paper aims to identify the optimum regression techniques for downscaling among ten commonly used methods in climatology, including SVR, LinearSVR, LASSO, LASSOCV, Elastic Net, Bayesian Ridge, RandomForestRegressor, AdaBoost Regressor, KNeighbors Regressor, and XGBRegressor. Historical data from Can_ESM5 were collected from four synoptic stations based on the Köppen climate classification. To achieve this goal, the data were classified based on the Köppen climate classification system, including A (tropical), B (dry), C (temperate), and D (continental). Additionally, to enhance the performance of downscaling accuracy, eliminate redundant information, and overcome overfitting, Mutual Information (MI) was employed on the Can-ESM5 dataset. The downscaling performance was evaluated using the Coefficient of Determination (DC) and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). In conclusion, SVR had superior performance in tropical and dry climates with DC and RMSE values of 0.89, 0.02 °C and 0.93, 0.01 °C, respectively. On the other hand, LassoCV with RandomForestRegressor had the best results in temperate and continental climates with DC and RMSE values of 0.87, 0.04 °C and 0.88, 0.03 °C, respectively. The outstanding performance of the optimum downscaling methods relies on the network structure in consideration of the suitability of those networks with the target variable and climate type.

Keywords
Downscaling
Climatology
Regression techniques
Köppen climate classification
Mutual Information (MI)
Manuscript
Assessing Drought Vulnerability in Alberta's Agricultural Sector: A Deep Learning Approach for Hydro-climatological Analysis
Evaluation of the capability of NARX neural network in predicting ground water level changes