EventsThe 1st International Electronic Conference on Toxics
Published
This submission belongs to the session B. Drugs Toxicity and Safety of the event The 1st International Electronic Conference on Toxics
Published date
03 Apr, 2024
Academic Editor
author-avatarYoussef Sari
Citation
Nelly Babayan, Helga Stopper, Lusine Khondkaryan, Ani Tevosyan, Gohar Tadevosyan, Lilit Apresyan, Lusine Adunts, Zaven Navoyan, Enhancing Chemical-Induced Human Carcinogenic Risk Evaluation through Advanced AI Technologies, in Proceedings of The 1st International Electronic Conference on Toxics, 20 March–22 March 2024, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Enhancing Chemical-Induced Human Carcinogenic Risk Evaluation through Advanced AI Technologies

Ani Tevosyan 4
Gohar Tadevosyan 3
Lilit Apresyan 3
Lusine Adunts 4
1. Institute of Molecular Biology, NAS RA;, Armenia
2. Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Würzburg, Germany, Germany
3. Institute of Molecular Biology, NAS RA, Armenia, Armenia
4. Toxometris.ai Inc., USA, USA
Abstract

Introduction: Efficient cancer risk assessment is vital for sustainable practices in pharma, agriculture, and environmental protection. Traditional animal tests for chemical carcinogenicity are time- and cost-consuming. Ongoing efforts focus on pioneering alternative approaches to improve accessibility and reliability in cancer risk assessment.

Objectives: This study aimed to develop a scoring function that can rank chemical compounds based on their potential human carcinogenicity through in silico methods.

Materials & methods: An ensemble of diverse AI/ML models, including Boosting Machines, Graph Neural Networks, and Large Language Models was used to predict endpoints associated with carcinogenicity, including in vitro mutagenicity, in vitro and in vivo clastogenicity/aneugenicity, and rodent carcinogenicity. The risk-score function was developed by applying a weighting strategy to every endpoint. The datasets of human carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic chemicals were used to evaluate the performance of risk-score, the p-value was estimated to indicate the significance of the difference.

Results: It was shown that the mean risk-score values differ significantly (p<0.0001) between human carcinogens and non-carcinogens. The accuracy to predict human carcinogens was 73%, which was slightly lower than the 76% accuracy achieved in experimental carcinogenicity studies in mice, while significantly surpassing the 65% accuracy obtained in studies with rats.

Conclusion: The devised risk score evaluates the potential of chemicals to induce cancer in humans in silico by integrating information from diverse cancer-related test results, providing an approach nearly as accurate as in vivo experiments. Due to its speed and efficiency, the developed approach can effectively be employed for screening of large quantities of chemicals. The developed risk score focuses on genotoxic carcinogens. It is anticipated to enhance the versatility and applicability of the approach through the inclusion of additional endpoints associated with non-genotoxic carcinogenesis, as well as by implementing more sophisticated AI/ML technologies, such as multi-task learning.

Keywords
carcinogenicity
in silico
risk-score
small molecules
ENDOGENOUS-EXOGENOUS CHEMICALS WITH NEUROTOXIC POTENTIAL
Genetic damage and multi-elemental exposure in populations in proximity to artisanal and small-scale gold mining areas in North Colombia