EventsThe 3rd International Electronic Conference on Processes
Published
This submission belongs to the session B. Energy Systems of the event The 3rd International Electronic Conference on Processes
Published date
28 May, 2024
Academic Editor
author-avatarMichael C. Georgiadis
Citation
Abubakar Umar, Muhammed Bashir Mu’azu, Yusuf Sha’aban Abubakar, Zaharuddeen Haruna, Ime Jarlath Umoh, Shamsuddeen Yusuf, Quadrotor UAV Altitude Control using FOPID, PID and Integral State Feedback Controller, in Proceedings of The 3rd International Electronic Conference on Processes, 29 May–31 May 2024, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Quadrotor UAV Altitude Control using FOPID, PID and Integral State Feedback Controller

Muhammed Bashir Mu’azu 1
Yusuf Sha’aban Abubakar 1
Ime Jarlath Umoh 1
1. Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria 810107, Nigeria, Nigeria
Abstract

This research presents the development of an altitude control for a quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) using a fractional-order proportional--integral--derivative (FOPID) controller, a proportional--integral--derivative (PID) controller, and an integral state feedback (ISF) controller. The quadrotor UAV, which is a nonlinear, multiple-input, multiple-output, and underactuated system, was modelled using the Newton--Euler modelling system, in which the UAV’s translational and angular velocity was derived mathematically. The quadrotor UAV was then linearized for easy analysis and modelled in MATLAB/Simulink. The simulation was carried out in the MATLAB/Simulink 2022b environment. Two cases were considered: the open-loop and closed-loop responses. The two cases were simulated, and the system performed satisfactorily in both open-loop and closed-loop scenarios. Also, FOPID, PID, and ISF controllers were applied on the closed-loop scenario for the altitude control of the UAV. From the simulation results, it can be deduced that FOPID outperformed PID and ISF controllers in terms of settling time and rise time, with values of 0.008 secs and 0.0236 secs, respectively. Also, the ISF controller had a better overshoot of 0%, while the PID controller had a better steady-state error (SSE) of 7.1524e-10, which were all obtained from the simulations. The contribution of this work is the application of FOPID with respect to the altitude control of quadrotor UAV. This shows the advantages of the FOPID controller regarding the altitude control of the quadrotor UAV in terms of robustness and reliability.

Keywords
Quadrotor
UAV
Altitude control
FOPID
PID
ISF
A Review of Smart Grid Technologies: Past, Present, and Future Outlook
Evaluating The Present Energy Demand and Electricity Market in Mozambique: A Thorough Examination of The Energy System