EventsThe 4th International Electronic Conference on Forests
Published
This submission belongs to the session S2. Forest Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services, and Earth Observations of the event The 4th International Electronic Conference on Forests
Published date
19 Sep, 2024
Academic Editor
author-avatarTianxiang Yue
Citation
Antonio Peña-Fernández, Manuel Higueras, Tiziana Sgamma, Mark D. Evans, Carmen Lobo Bedmar, María de los Ángeles Peña, Gurminderjeet S Jagdev, Content of lutetium in wild soil mushrooms from Leicester city and surroundings areas in England, in Proceedings of The 4th International Electronic Conference on Forests, 23 September–25 September 2024, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Content of lutetium in wild soil mushrooms from Leicester city and surroundings areas in England

image
image
Gurminderjeet S Jagdev 5
1. Department of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, Ctra. Madrid-Barcelona, Km. 33.600, 28871 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain., Spain
2. Leicester School of Allied Health Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, LE1 9BH, UK.
3. Scientific Computation & Technological Innovation Center (SCoTIC), Universidad de La Rioja, Logroño, Spain., Spain
4. Departamento de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad de Alcalá, Crta. Madrid-Barcelona Km, 33.6, 28871 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain, Spain
5. Leicester School of Allied Health Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, LE1 9BH, UK., UK
6. Departamento de Investigación Agroambiental. IMIDRA. Finca el Encín, Crta. Madrid-Barcelona Km, 38.2, 28800 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain., Spain
Abstract

Background: Although the ingestion of and dermal contact with lutetium (Lu) has recently been measured in topsoils across Leicester (UK) and surrounding rural areas as low risk, this heavy rare earth element (HREE) was biomonitored in wild mushrooms.

Methods: A total of 106 mushrooms were collected from Leicester city and Bradgate Park. Species identification was confirmed by DNA barcoding. Lu was monitored by ICP-MS in cleaned/dried/homogenised mushrooms [LoD=0.506 ng/g dry weight (dw)] and in topsoils collected in these areas; physicochemical properties and textures were also determined in topsoils using standard methods. The data were processed with NADA available in R software, owing to the censored values detected in mushrooms (60.8%).

Results: Contrary to the distribution determined in topsoils [0.123 (0.069-0.162) vs. 0.117 (0.084-0.182); median and ranges, mg/kg], the levels of Lu were higher in mushrooms collected in the main urban area (median and ranges, in ng/g dw): 0.347 (0.285-293.837) vs. 0.196 (0.780-8.116). The content of Lu in topsoils would only have a small effect on the levels of Lu detected in mushrooms, which is supported by the lack of correlation found between mushrooms and topsoils (p-value=0.506) and by the different physicochemical properties and soil textures monitored. This pattern is different to other HREEs studied in the same areas, which might be explained by an unknown appetence for Lu by the different local species of wild soil mushrooms collected. Lu also varied between major mushroom species collected (median or 95-percentile and range, in ng/g): Agaricus bitorquis [edible; 88.6% of censored values, 1.518 (0.798-6.715), Panaeolus foenisecii [poisonous; 1.740 (0.812-49.692)], and Mycena citrinomarginata [unclassified; 0.855 (0.285-10.351)]. Lu also seemed to show little appetence for wild edible species when comparing with non-edible.

Conclusions: Although our results should be considered as preliminary, in general, collecting local wild edible mushroom species in Leicestershire would represent a small risk for humans due to their content of lutetium.

Keywords
Lutetium
mushrooms
Leicester
topsoils
risks.
Poster
sciforum-099951_Antonio_Peña-Fernández.pdf
Facts speak louder than words: an environmentalist message against the invasion of pine trees through citizen participation in manual removal campaigns
Biomonitoring air quality for praseodymium in Leicestershire (UK)