EventsThe 1st International Online Conference on Bioengineering
Published
This submission belongs to the session 5. Biosignal Processing of the event The 1st International Online Conference on Bioengineering
Published date
11 Oct, 2024
Academic Editor
author-avatarAndrea Cataldo
Citation
Ahmed M. Yousef, Eric J. Hunter, Effect of Data Collection and Environment on Machine Learning Performance in Screening Dysphonia, in Proceedings of The 1st International Online Conference on Bioengineering, 16 October–18 October 2024, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Effect of Data Collection and Environment on Machine Learning Performance in Screening Dysphonia

1. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA, USA
Abstract

Objectives/Introduction: Machine learning (ML) is a promising tool for assessing voice quality and dysphonia. Several public datasets containing recordings of both normal and pathological voices are available online. Since ML benefits from larger datasets, combining these available datasets could enhance ML performance. However, the varying environmental conditions under which these recordings were collected may impact ML accuracy, and the extent of this impact is unclear. This work aims to investigate how different data collection procedures affect ML efficacy in screening dysphonia.

Methods: Two datasets were considered. The first dataset included voice samples from 198 participants: 148 individuals with voice disorders and 50 vocally normal subjects. The second dataset, the publicly available PVQD database, included 276 subjects: 187 patients with voice problems and 89 without vocal issues. Various acoustic measurements (including perturbation, noise, cepstral, and spectral analyses) were estimated from the recordings using MATLAB scripts and Praat software. These measurements were derived from multiple types of speech productions: a sustained vowel /a:/ and running speech. Different ML models were trained on the extracted acoustic features from each recording and evaluated for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves to compare the impact of each dataset, collected under different procedures, on dysphonic voice classification.

Results and Conclusions: Accurate acoustic metrics were generated from the two datasets. Using these measurements, ML models were successfully trained and evaluated to classify dysphonic versus non-dysphonic speakers. The comparative analysis revealed discrepancies in classification accuracy among the models between the two datasets and when the datasets were combined. Identifying which ML models are robust or sensitive to changes in data collection environments helps in selecting appropriate models for tasks involving different datasets with varying data collection procedures. The outcome is an important step towards more reliable/effective ML tools in screening voice disorders.

Keywords
Voice Disorders
Voice Assessment
Machine Learning
Speech Acoustics
Poster
Submission ID sciforum101205.pdf
Layer-by-layer assembly for manufacturing local chemotherapy platforms with controlled and sustained drug release to prevent local tumor relapse
How Do Room Acoustics Impact Machine Learning Accuracy in Voice Disorder Detection?