EventsThe 5th International Electronic Conference on Foods
Published
This submission belongs to the session S8. Food Quality and Safety of the event The 5th International Electronic Conference on Foods
Published date
25 Oct, 2024
Academic Editor
author-avatarAntonello Santini
Citation
Man Zhang, Comparative analysis of flavor characterization in duck meat prepared by sous vide and conventional cooking methods, in Proceedings of The 5th International Electronic Conference on Foods, 28 October–30 October 2024, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Comparative analysis of flavor characterization in duck meat prepared by sous vide and conventional cooking methods

1. Yangzhou University, China
Abstract

This study investigated the effect of different cooking methods (sous vide—SV, steaming—ST, boiling—BT, microwaving—MW, roasting—RT, and sous vide combined with microwaving—SM) on the flavor characteristics of duck meat by gas chromatography—ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS), gas chromatography--mass spectrometry (GC-MS) with odor activity values (OAVs) and sensory evaluation. The GC-IMS identified forty-eight flavor compounds, including their monomers, dimers, and trimer. The contents of esters and furan in SV samples were higher than in other samples, while the contents of aldehydes and hydrocarbon in ST were relatively higher. Seventy-two flavor components and fourteen odor-active compounds were detected by GC-MS combined with OAVs. The concentration of total volatiles was the highest in ST samples, and this was followed by SV and MW. Among them, the characteristic aroma compounds including hexanal, octanal, (E)-2-octenal, nonanal, (E)-2-nonenal, cis-4-decenal, decanal, 2,4-decadienal, (E,E)-2,4-decadienal, 1-octen-3-ol, and 1-octen-3-one were the key contributors to duck meat in different cooking methods. A principal component analysis (PCA) of GC-IMS and GC-MS with OAVs data indicated that there were significant flavor distinctions among duck meat processed in different cooking methods. Sensory evaluation revealed that the scores of overall acceptability were relatively higher in BT, SV, and MW samples than other samples, and the umami value was the highest in MW. Thus, ST, SV, and MW could be used to better maintain the flavor quality of duck meat, and the results provided guidance for duck meat producers.

Keywords
Cooking methods
Duck meat
GC-IMS
GC-MS
OAV
Sensory evaluation
Poster
Man Zhang.pdf
Lactic acid fermentation of papaya and mint: physicochemical parameters and bioactive compounds
Gram-positive and Gram-negative Bacteria Inhibition Potential of Ethanol Extract Ethiopian ginger (Zingiber officinale) Genotypes