EventsThe 2nd International Electronic Conference on Clinical Medicine
Published
This submission belongs to the session S2. Gastroenterology & Hepatopancreatobiliary Medicine of the event The 2nd International Electronic Conference on Clinical Medicine
Published date
11 Nov, 2024
Academic Editor
author-avatarEmmanuel Andrès
Citation
Georgios Giannos, Evangelos Kritsotakis, Hammam Migdadi, Dimitra Kostoglou, Eleftherios Eleftherios Pitsidopoulos, Christos Kontovounisios, Konstantinos Lasithiotakis, Safety, feasibility and preliminary results of a multicenter randomized trial comparing fat-free versus balanced (WHO) diet in gallstone disease (The Rationale Diet for Gallstones (RADIGAL) study), in Proceedings of The 2nd International Electronic Conference on Clinical Medicine, 13 November–15 November 2024, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Safety, feasibility and preliminary results of a multicenter randomized trial comparing fat-free versus balanced (WHO) diet in gallstone disease (The Rationale Diet for Gallstones (RADIGAL) study)

image
Hammam Migdadi 3
image
image
1. 2nd Department of Surgery, Evaggelismos, General Hospital of Athens, Greece, Greece
2. Laboratory of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Greece, Greece
3. Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Heraklion, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece, Greece
4. School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece, Greece
Abstract

Rationale:

There is no high-level-of-evidence data to support the general notion that a fat-free diet is beneficial to patients with gallstone disease. Herein, we assess the feasibility and safety of a randomized study to assess the effect of recommending a fat-free diet versus a balanced-WHO diet on the quality of life (QoL) in symptomatic patients with gallstones (RADIGAL-1) and in patients undergoing cholecystectomy for gallstone disease (RADIGAL-2).

Methods:

This is a multicenter, randomized, single-blind, parallel-arm, non-inferiority trial. Patients presenting with biliary colic or acute cholecystitis or undergoing cholecystectomy for gallstones are randomly assigned to recommending either a fat-free or a balanced WHO diet. A follow-up at 3 months will appraise patient adherence and outcomes. A validated quality-of-life questionnaire (GIQLI) will be administered both at baseline and during follow-up. A total of 136 patients will be recruited for RADIGAL-1 and 106 for RADIGAL-2 according to sample size calculation based on the mean clinically important difference of GIQLI scores.

Results:

The rate of recruitment in the participating centers is eight patients per month for RADIGAL-1 and twenty for RADIGAL-2. In RADIGAL-1, full compliance was recorded in 87.8% of the patients. Additionally, 2.4% of the patients followed the diet for more than 50% of the follow-up time, while 4.8% followed it for less than 50% of the time. In RADIGAL-2, full compliance was recorded in 88.3% of the patients. Moreover, 8.3% of the patients followed the diet for more than 50% of the follow-up time, and 3.3% followed it for less than 50% of the time. Drop-off rates are 2.4% for RADIGAL-1 and 1.7% for RADIGAL-2. No adverse events such as hospital admissions or biliary colic have occurred in excess in the control groups.

Conclusion:

These data support the safety and the feasibility of the RADIGAL trial (NCT06405906).

Keywords
Gallstone disease
cholecystitis
cholecystectomy
gallbladder diet
The First Systematic Review of the Surgical Management of Complicated Abdominal Tuberculosis—New Treatments for an Ancient Disease and the State of the Art
The Role of AI-Enhanced Optical Coherence Tomography in the Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Cancers