EventsThe 2nd International Electronic Conference on Genes
Published
This submission belongs to the session D. Technologies and Resources for Genetics Research of the event The 2nd International Electronic Conference on Genes
Published date
09 Dec, 2024
Academic Editor
author-avatarSelvarangan Ponnazhagan
Citation
Sakeena Bairamova, Konstantin Pavlov, An approach to identifying aggression profiles via machine learning, in Proceedings of The 2nd International Electronic Conference on Genes, 11 December–13 December 2024, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

An approach to identifying aggression profiles via machine learning

1. V. Serbsky National Medical Research Centre of Psychiatry and Narcology, Kropotkinsky per. 23, 119034 Moscow, Russia, Russia
Abstract

The complex nature of aggression and challenges in phenotype description often make it difficult to identify genetic variations associated with aggressive behavior. The use of machine learning algorithms and multivariate analysis makes it possible to construct more accurate diagnostic schemes to characterize the underlying causes of aggression. The aim of this study was to develop a method to differentiate aggression profiles among subjects in a heterogeneous sample and to facilitate the association of the obtained profiles with genetic variations of BDNF rs6265, BDNF rs10835210, HTR2A rs6313, and DRD4 1800955 later.

Participants' aggressiveness was assessed using the Buss–Durkee Hostility Inventory (BDHI). On the basis of the 10 scales of the BDHI, 1013 unique subspaces were formed, in which data were clustered. "Cluster neighborhood" plots were constructed for each participant in the study, allowing us to identify the content of each category of subjects in all of the clusters into which the participant fell. This approach demonstrated two dramatically different phenotypes based on all the possible combinations of characteristics. However, many study participants exhibited mixed phenotypes, which were separated using the DBSCAN spatial clustering algorithm.

Individuals initially classified into a control group, addiction-prone group, or inmate group (convicted of felony) were often adjacent to each other in the newly formed clusters, suggesting the need to reevaluate the sample: 13 individuals from the addiction-prone group and 17 individuals from the inmate group were assigned to the control group, and 24 individuals from the inmate group and 6 individuals from the control group were assigned to the addiction-prone group. A total of 140 individuals belonged to the monotype group, while the remaining 261 individuals belonged to the mixed phenotype group.

Phenotypes defined by indirect traits often create an erroneous picture. It is necessary to identify similar groups of patients based on their psychometric data and then examine their genotypes within these groups.

Keywords
machine learning
aggression
The role of non-coding RNAs (miRNA and lncRNA) in the diagnosis and prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis
Uremic toxin levels are associated with miR-223 in Chronic Kidney Disease-associated anemia