EventsThe 2nd International Electronic Conference on Antioxidants
Published
This submission belongs to the session S6. Antioxidants Extraction, Assay and Industrial Applications of the event The 2nd International Electronic Conference on Antioxidants
Published date
09 Apr, 2025
Academic Editor
author-avatarAlessandra Napolitano
Citation
Christine Boesch, Gizem Catalkaya, Sadia Zulfiqar, Meryem Benohoud, Phil Metcalfe, Comparison of commonly used methods for efficient extraction and quantification of polyphenols, in Proceedings of The 2nd International Electronic Conference on Antioxidants, 7 April–9 April 2025, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Comparison of commonly used methods for efficient extraction and quantification of polyphenols

Sadia Zulfiqar 1
Phil Metcalfe 2
1. School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, UK, UK
2. Biopower Ltd, UK, UK
Abstract

Polyphenols, known for their antioxidant properties, are plant secondary metabolites whose efficient extraction depends on factors such as solvent type, extraction conditions, and sample matrix. The present study compared different commonly used extraction conditions to recover polyphenols from different dried fruit and vegetable combinations (mainly citrus, berries, and beetroot) to identify a broadly applicable approach suitable for a range of samples. Selected extraction conditions compared cold maceration with a sonication-assisted approach, different temperature conditions (RT and 60°C) and different ethanol (acidified) concentrations (30 and 80%) as extraction solvent. The total polyphenol content (TPC) was determined using the commonly used Folin–Ciocalteu assay as well as Fast Blue assay as an alternative option, which has recently been proposed as a more accurate reflection of the actual polyphenol content.

The results show consistently higher TPC across different samples following extractions with 30% ethanol than 80% as the extraction solvent, indicating better suitability for polyphenol extraction. Furthermore, samples extracted at RT showed higher TPC compared to samples extracted at 60°C. Whilst sonication-assisted extraction slightly improved TPC recovery in some samples, it was generally less favourable due to the prolonged sample processing time. When comparing the Folin–Ciocalteu versus Fast Blue assay, both methods for determining TPCwere highly reproducible, although the Fast Blue assay showed markedly higher values for all samples. The accuracy of the polyphenol assay methods is currently confirmed with HPLC.

In summary, based on the overall best performance of 30% ethanol extraction at RT, this approach could be recommended across a range of different samples. The different performance of the two polyphenol assays requires further attention, and more sensitive approaches such as HPLC should be employed to confirm their accuracy and reliability.

Keywords
polyphenol extraction
antioxidants
Folin assay
Fast blue assay
Organic sunscreens and their environmental degradation products: an in silico study of interactions with enzymatic antioxidant systems in the human placenta
Green synthesis, characterization, and evaluation of antioxidant properties of silver nanoparticles derived from marine brown algae Padina sp.