EventsThe 5th International Electronic Conference on Biosensors
Published
This submission belongs to the session E. Nanomaterials and Smart Surfaces in Biosensors of the event The 5th International Electronic Conference on Biosensors
Published date
02 May, 2025
Academic Editor
author-avatarMichael Thompson
Citation
Basit Abdul, Qadeer Abdul, Abdul Rab Asary, An analysis and comparison of microelectromagnetic vibration energy harvesters., in Proceedings of The 5th International Electronic Conference on Biosensors, 26 May–28 May 2025, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

An analysis and comparison of microelectromagnetic vibration energy harvesters.

Abdul Rab Asary 3
1. Department of Microbiology, The University of Lahore, Pakistan, Pakistan
2. University of Sherbrooke, Canada 2500 Bd de l'Université, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada, Canada
3. Fluid and Energy Systems Engineering Laboratory - LIFSE, Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology Paris, 151 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France, France
Abstract

Based on microelectromechanical (MEMS) technology, this paper presents two electromagnetic vibration energy harvesters. We designed and fabricated two models with different vibration structures. As part of the energy harvester, a permanent magnet is attached to a vibration structure (resonator) made from silicon and a very small wire-wound coil. The total volume of the coil is about 0.9 cm3. Tests and comparisons are performed on two energy harvesters with different resonators.

The maximum load voltage of Model A is 143 mV, and, for Model B, it is 196 mV. Model A generated a maximum load power of 51.52 μW across a 405 Ω load at 347 Hz. Model B generated a maximum load power of 135.35 μW at 311.4 Hz with an acceleration of 0.5 g. Compared to Model A, Model B has a higher output voltage and greater working bandwidth. Under similar experimental conditions, Model B's performance is better than Model A's. Using simple analysis, the results indicated that electromagnetic energy harvesting with Model B provided better results. Furthermore, it shows that a non-linear spring might be able to extend the frequency bandwidth and increase the output voltage.

Keywords
Vibration Energy Harvesting
Electromagnetic Induction
Micro energy harvester
MEMS
Model A and B
Tandem β-mercaptoethanol and 2-(3-trichlorosilylpropyloxy)-ethyltrifluoroacetate Coating on Flat Gold Surfaces to Significantly Prevent Non-Specific Adsorption
Advanced chemical processes in the development of microelectrodes for electrochemical sensors