EventsThe 7th International Electronic Conference on Atmospheric Sciences
Published
This submission belongs to the session S2. Air Quality and Human Health of the event The 7th International Electronic Conference on Atmospheric Sciences
Published date
30 May, 2025
Academic Editor
author-avatarRegina Duarte
Citation
Antonio Pennetta, Ermelinda Bloise, Daniela Cesari, Giuseppe Deluca, Daniele Contini, Adelaide Dinoi, Paola Semeraro, Florin Unga, Maria Rachele Guascito, Livia Giotta, Giulia Lionetto, Lorena Carla Giannossa, Annarosa Mangone, Gianna Manelli, Serena Potì, Evaluation of the role of natural and anthropogenic sources on acellular and in vitro TOXicity INdicators of AtmospherIc aerosol (TOX-IN-AIR): preliminary results, in Proceedings of The 7th International Electronic Conference on Atmospheric Sciences, 4 June–6 June 2025, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Evaluation of the role of natural and anthropogenic sources on acellular and in vitro TOXicity INdicators of AtmospherIc aerosol (TOX-IN-AIR): preliminary results

image
Giuseppe Deluca 1
image
image
image
Maria Rachele Guascito 3
Gianna Manelli 2
image
image
image
image
1. Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate - ISAC-CNR, Lecce, 73100, Italy, Italy
2. Department of Chemistry, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70126 Bari, Italy, Italy
3. Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy, Italy
4. Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate - ISAC-CNR, Lecce, 73100, Italy
Abstract

Introduction: Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is a significant risk for public health. The mechanisms underlying its toxicity are still not fully understood, with contrasting results across acellular, cellular, and in vivo toxicity metrics. The TOX-IN-AIR project aims to analyse correlations between toxicity indicators and chemical composition, considering seasonal and site dependencies, and assess the contributions of natural and anthropogenic sources and their nonlinear interactions.

Methods: Two campaigns were conducted in winter and summer in Lecce, Italy. The Mobile Laboratory for Gas and Aerosol Measurements (MAGA) and the Environmental-Climate Observatory (ECO) platforms were used for the urban and urban background sites, respectively. PM2.5 samples were collected on Teflon and quartz filters. Particle size distributions, meteorological data, and gas concentrations were measured online. In the laboratory, the PM2.5 fraction was weighed, and subsequently, the chemical composition was measured by ED-XRF. The filters were then fractionated and subjected to a) chemical characterization; b) acellular determination of oxidative potential; and c) cellular in vitro analysis.

Results and conclusions: The PM2.5 mass concentrations were very similar between the ECO and MAGA sites during both campaigns. Particle number concentrations (diameter ≤2.5 μm) were higher at the urban site compared to the suburban site, particularly during the winter period. Coarse particles (diameter≥ 2.54μm) were similar at the two sites. Peaks in coarse particles were observed during three days in both campaigns, attributed to long-range Saharan dust transport. The results of source apportionment by using the PMF receptor model will be presented.

This work was co-funded by Next Generation EU – Mission 4 – Ministry of University and Research (MUR) – Call PRIN 2022 PNRR – Project TOX-IN-AIR, P2022JKPS.

Keywords
PM2.5
PMF
chemical composition
oxidative potential
DTT assay
Urban Green Spaces and Human Health: Assessing the Allergenic Potential
Concept and development of air quality sensor for citizen science