EventsThe 15th International Conference on Environmental and Public Health Issues in Asian Mega-cities (EPAM 2025)
Published
This submission belongs to the session S5. Environmental Risk and Public Health of the event The 15th International Conference on Environmental and Public Health Issues in Asian Mega-cities (EPAM 2025)
Published date
05 Sep, 2025
Academic Editor
author-avatarMin Zhan
Citation
Jing Zhou, Xin Huang, Chenchen Wang, Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Atmospheric PM₂.₅ in Tianshan District and Midong District of Urumqi in 2023, in Proceedings of The 15th International Conference on Environmental and Public Health Issues in Asian Mega-cities (EPAM 2025), Shanghai, 16 October–18 October 2025, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Atmospheric PM2.5 in Tianshan District and Midong District of Urumqi in 2023

1. Xinjiang Medical University, China
2. Shihezi University, China
3. Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention, China
Abstract

To assess the health risks posed by heavy metals in atmospheric PM2.5 to the population in Tianshan District and Midong District of Urumqi in 2023, this study referred to the Ambient Air Quality Standards (GB3095-2012) and relevant sections of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Regional Screening Levels (RSL) General Table for ambient air. Toxicological parameters of heavy metals via inhalation were summarized. A benchmark excess cancer risk of 1×10⁻⁶ and a hazard quotient of 1 were used to calculate screening concentrations and determine whether further assessment was required. Exposure concentrations were computed using relevant formulas, and both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks were evaluated based on the excess cancer risk and hazard quotient formulas. The results showed that the annual average concentrations of 12 heavy metals in PM2.5 in both districts followed the order: aluminum > lead > manganese > arsenic > selenium > antimony > chromium > nickel > cadmium > thallium > beryllium > mercury. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) were observed in the distribution of seven heavy metals (antimony, aluminum, arsenic, beryllium, lead, nickel, and thallium) between the two districts. The annual average concentrations of lead, cadmium, and mercury did not exceed the national standards. Health risk characterization indicated that the excess cancer risks of arsenic and chromium exceeded 1×10⁻⁴. The lifetime excess cancer risks at the 95th percentile in Midong District were 1.43×10⁻⁴ for arsenic and 1.17×10⁻⁴ for chromium, while in Tianshan District, they were 1.04×10⁻⁴ for arsenic and 4.83×10⁻⁵ for chromium. These levels indicate significant carcinogenic risks to the population, necessitating targeted prevention and control measures to mitigate health risks.

Keywords
PM2.5
Heavy metals
Health risk assessment
Excess cancer risk
Significant Boost in Energy Efficiency of High-Tech Greenhouse Capsicum Amid Projected Climate Scenarios
Analysis of the Association between Exposure to Perchlorate, Thiocyanate, and Nitrate and Thyroid Hormone Levels in Pregnant Women