EventsThe 3rd International Online Conference on Agriculture
Published
This submission belongs to the session S6. Smart Farming: From Sensor to Artificial Intelligence of the event The 3rd International Online Conference on Agriculture
Published date
20 Oct, 2025
Academic Editor
author-avatarSanzidur Rahman
Citation
Andrea Apicella, Smart Farming and Digital Divide: Structural Inequalities in Access to AI and Digital Technologies among Smallholder Farmers, in Proceedings of The 3rd International Online Conference on Agriculture, 22 October–24 October 2025, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Smart Farming and Digital Divide: Structural Inequalities in Access to AI and Digital Technologies among Smallholder Farmers

1. Department of Economics and Management, University of Pisa, Pisa, 56126, Italy, Italy
Abstract

Introduction:

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and digital technologies into the agricultural sector represents a potentially transformative development for increasing productivity, optimizing resource use, and promoting sustainable practices. However, the diffusion of such innovations is far from uniform: significant disparities are emerging between small and large-scale farms, as well as between developed and marginal rural areas. This scenario raises serious concerns regarding existing structural inequalities and the risk of digital exclusion for a substantial portion of the farming population, particularly in disadvantaged contexts.

Methods:

This study presents a systematic review of recent empirical and conceptual literature (2019–2025), focusing on the adoption of smart farming technologies in sub-Saharan Africa. It analyzes eight key studies from Scopus-indexed sources, assessing infrastructure availability, economic barriers, and farmers' digital literacy through qualitative and quantitative approaches.

Results:

The findings reveal a substantial digital divide. Smallholder farmers report limited access to ICTs due to high costs, poor connectivity, and lack of technical support. In South Africa, 78.8% of surveyed farmers perceived digital tools as too expensive and 81% lacked the required skills (Bontsa et al. 2024). These barriers are compounded by perceptions of limited reliability and low trust in digital systems.

Conclusions:

While AI-driven farming promises increased efficiency, its benefits remain unequally distributed. Without targeted interventions, such as infrastructure development, affordable technology, and context-specific training, digital agriculture risks reinforcing existing inequalities. To ensure an inclusive agricultural transformation, policies must prioritize digital equity, particularly for marginalized rural producers.

Keywords
Smart Farming
Digital Agriculture
Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture
Digital Divide
Smallholder Farmers
Distinguishability of Homogeneity Stability in sweet potato genotypes
In situ Rumen Degradation of Fresh and Ensiled Guinea Grass (Megathyrsus maximus Jacq.) Cultivars Harvested at 30 and 45 Days