EventsThe 6th International Electronic Conference on Foods
Published
This submission belongs to the session B. Nutritional and Functional Foods of the event The 6th International Electronic Conference on Foods
Published date
27 Oct, 2025
Academic Editor
author-avatarAntonello Santini
Citation
Joel Benjamin Johnson, Natasha Hungerford, Yasmina Sultanbawa, Michael Netzel, Native Australian Citrus as a valuable source of vitamins and antioxidants, in Proceedings of The 6th International Electronic Conference on Foods, 28 October–30 October 2025, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Native Australian Citrus as a valuable source of vitamins and antioxidants

image
image
image
1. Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, Health and Food Sciences Precinct, Coopers Plains, Qld 4108, Australia, Australia
2. Centre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Health and Food Sciences Precinct, Coopers Plains, Qld 4108, Australia, Australia
Abstract

Australia has six endemic species of Citrus: Citrus australasica (finger lime), C. australis (Gympie lime), C. garrawayi (Mount White lime), C. glauca (desert lime), C. gracilis (Humpty Doo lime) and C. inodora (Russell River lime). However, the nutritional and chemical composition of the fruit from many species remains largely unknown. An analysis of five of the native Australian Citrus species by HPLC-UV revealed that the vitamin C content of C. inodora flesh was 4× higher than that of commercial Tahitian lime (C. × latifolia), while C. glauca had almost 7× higher vitamin C. Two species (C. australasica and C. glauca) contained quantifiable levels of pro-vitamin A (β-carotene; 7-18 mg/kg DW) in their pulp, compared to no detectable β-carotene in Tahitian lime, while the peel of C. australis contained 3× more β-carotene than Tahitian lime peel. C. australasica and C. glauca pulp contained comparable vitamin E (α-tocopherol) content to Tahitian lime, while the α-tocopherol of C. inodora was 3× higher. Furthermore, the peel of four C. australasica varieties contained 18-33× higher α-tocopherol content compared to Tahitian lime. Finally, the antioxidant capacity (DPPH assay) of C. glauca pulp was double that of Tahitian lime. These results show the promising nutritional composition of native Australian Citrus, with potential uses for fresh consumption, food processing, or in cosmetic products.

Keywords
Native Australian foods
vitamins
functional food
Cell-Free Supernatant from a Foodborne Enterococcus faecium Strain Inhibits the Sessile Growth of Salmonella Typhimurium in Single- and Mixed-Species Biofilms
Functional Sour Beer Development Using Apple Pomace: Evaluation of Pre-Fermentation and Co-Fermentation with Levilactobacillus brevis