EventsThe 6th International Electronic Conference on Foods
Published
This submission belongs to the session A. Food Technology and Engineering of the event The 6th International Electronic Conference on Foods
Published date
27 Oct, 2025
Academic Editor
author-avatarMohsen Gavahian
Citation
Alessandro Bianchi, Stefano Pettinelli, Chiara Sanmartin, Isabella Taglieri, Ventilated Room Temperature Drying as a Sustainable Alternative to Hot-Stove and Freeze-Drying Processes for Hops cv. Cascade, in Proceedings of The 6th International Electronic Conference on Foods, 28 October–30 October 2025, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Ventilated Room Temperature Drying as a Sustainable Alternative to Hot-Stove and Freeze-Drying Processes for Hops cv. Cascade

image
image
1. Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, 56124 Pisa, Italy, Italy
Abstract

Hops are a fundamental component in beer production, primarily valued for their aroma, bitterness, and preservative qualities. Drying is essential to ensure their storability and usability throughout the year, but the method employed can significantly influence their chemical and sensory attributes. This study compared three hop-drying techniques—hot-stove drying (H), freeze-drying (F), and ventilated room temperature drying (VRT)—with respect to their impact on the quality of dried hops, focusing on bioactive compounds, antioxidant activity, and volatile profile. To achieve an 80% reduction in moisture content, both F and H required 48 hours at 40 °C and −52.4 °C (0.04 mBar), respectively. In contrast, VRT required five days at 25 °C under continuous airflow (1.2 m/s) with a humidity of 30%. F and H preserved a high content of total chlorophyll (F 81.89 g/kg dm; H 82.70 g/kg dm) and carotenoids (F 54.02 g/kg dm; H 54.71 g/kg dm). However, VRT preserved the highest total phenolic content (631.11 mg GAE/100 g dm), as determined by the Folin–Ciocalteu method, significantly outperforming H (348.48 mg GAE/100 g dm). Freeze-drying resulted in the best antioxidant activity (21.25 mmol TE/kg dm and 35.42 mmol TE/kg dm), measured via DPPH and ABTS assays, but its high operational cost limits its practical application. VRT showed the most significant increase in monoterpene hydrocarbons, while all treatments preserved key sesquiterpenes such as α-humulene, β-caryophyllene, and β-farnesene. Volatile compounds were extracted via solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and analyzed using GC-MS. Although browning was visually observed in VRT-dried hops, it was quantitatively confirmed through color variation analysis using the CIELab method. In conclusion, VRT appears to be a promising, low-cost technique to preserve the aromatic and antioxidant profile of hops, particularly suitable for small-scale brewers. Future research should further investigate the effects of these drying methods on beer quality and fermentation performance.

Keywords
Humulus lupulus L.
dehydration techniques
total polyphenols
hop storage index
color
aromatic composition
chlorophyll
carotenoids
Use of Annurca Apple Peel Flour (Malus domestica) and Cherry Seed Oil in the Formulation of Enriched Crackers
A Biochar-Integrated Hydroponic Platform for Enhanced Microgreen Food Cultivation under Water-Limited Conditions