EventsThe 1st International Electronic Conference on Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmaceutics
Published
This submission belongs to the session S4. New Small molecules as drug candidates of the event The 1st International Electronic Conference on Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmaceutics
Published date
29 Oct, 2025
Academic Editor
author-avatarSerena Massari
Citation
Marcin Gackowski, Weronika Długosz, Katarzyna Mądra-Gackowska, Łukasz Szeleszczuk, QSAR Analysis of 5,6‑Dimethoxyindanone‑Piperazine Derivatives as Potent Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors, in Proceedings of The 1st International Electronic Conference on Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmaceutics, 1 November–30 November 2025, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

QSAR Analysis of 5,6‑Dimethoxyindanone‑Piperazine Derivatives as Potent Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors

image
image
image
1. Department of Toxicology and Bromatology, Faculty of Pharmacy, L. Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, A. Jurasza 2 Street, PL-85089 Bydgoszcz, Poland, Poland
2. Department of Geriatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, L. Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Skłodowskiej Curie 9 Street, PL–85094 Bydgoszcz, Poland, Poland
3. Department of Organic and Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1 Street, PL–02093 Warsaw, Poland, Poland
Abstract

Background: The cholinergic deficit in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is treated symptomatically with acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors, yet current drugs suffer from limited brain penetration and adverse effects. 5,6-Dimethoxyindanone constitutes the pharmacophore of donepezil; conjugation with piperazine yields analogues with promising activity. Methods: IC₅₀ values for fifteen dimethoxyindanone–piperazine derivatives were extracted from a study employing the Ellman assay and converted to pIC₅₀ for modelling. Three-dimensional geometries were energy-minimised (MM⁺ PM3), and 4 885 Dragon descriptors calculated. After statistical filtering (low variance, excessive missing data, inter-correlation r ≥ 0.95), 843 descriptors remained. Stepwise selection isolated four key variables—Mor22v, HATS8p, VE1_B(p) and C-006—encoding molecular volume, spatial polarizability, electronic distribution and CH₂RX fragments. An artificial neural network (MLP 4-3-1, BFGS) was trained on nine compounds, validated on three and externally tested on a further three. Results: The model reproduced experimental activity with R² = 0.961, Q² = 0.999 and MAE = 0.001 µM; external prediction yielded R²test = 0.928. Sensitivity analysis ranked C-006 as the dominant contributor, indicating that strategic CH₂RX substitution at the indanone core drives potency, while Mor22v and VE1_B(p) emphasised the favourable impact of molecular volume and electron-withdrawing groups. Conclusions: This concise ANN-QSAR model delivers accurate, mechanism-based predictions and provides tangible design rules—enhanced polarizability, optimal volume and selective halogenation—for next-generation, brain-penetrant AChE inhibitors. The workflow is fully transferable to larger libraries and multi-target optimisation, paving the way for rapid, cost-effective exploration of indanone-based chemotypes in AD drug discovery.

Keywords
5,6-dimethoxyindanone
piperazine
acetylcholinesterase
QSAR
artificial neural networks
Alzheimer’s disease
Poster
sciforum_142565.pdf
Liposomes for potential delivery of Aloe vera waste antioxidants
QSAR Modelling of Ferulic-Acid Derivatives to Support the Design of Brain-Penetrant Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors for Alzheimer’s Therapy