EventsThe 4th International Online Conference on Materials
Published
This submission belongs to the session S7. Materials Manufacturing, Processing and Applications of the event The 4th International Online Conference on Materials
Published date
29 Oct, 2025
Academic Editor
author-avatarMohammad Malekan
Citation
Ramin Moradi, Luca Iuliano, Abdollah Saboori, Vahid Yaghoubi Nasrabadi, Amir Behjat, Vibration-based Intelligent Monitoring for L-PBF Additive Manufacturing, in Proceedings of The 4th International Online Conference on Materials, 3 November–6 November 2025, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Vibration-based Intelligent Monitoring for L-PBF Additive Manufacturing

image
image
1. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca Degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy, Italy
2. Integrated Additive Manufacturing Center (IAM@PoliTo), Politecnico di Torino, Corso Castelfidardo 51, 10129 Torino, Italy, Italy
3. Department of Management and Production Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy
4. Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, The Netherlands
5. Department of Management and Production Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy, Italy
6. Integrated Additive Manufacturing Center (IAM@PoliTo), Politecnico di Torino, Corso Castelfidardo 51, 10129 Torino, Italy
Abstract

Ensuring defect‐free parts in metal additive manufacturing (AM) is vital for safety‐critical components, yet it often relies on costly trial‐and‐error and slow computed‐tomography (CT) inspections. Here, we introduce a two‐stage, machine‐learning‐driven quality‐assurance framework for laser powder‐bed fusion (L‐PBF) that balances predictive modeling with rapid, vibration‐based, non‐destructive evaluation (NDE).

Stage 1: Process‐Parameter Optimization
A full‐factorial design of experiments (DoE) covering laser power, scan speed, and hatch spacing (75 successful builds) feeds a polynomial Ridge‐regression surrogate. Using nested 5‐fold cross‐validation and grid‐search tuning, the final quadratic Ridge model achieved a validation R² of 0.51 (RMSE ≈ 0.59 % density), capturing just over half of the variance in out‐of‐sample relative‐density measurements .

Stage 2: Vibration‐Based Defect Screening
Specimens are subjected to modal excitation and frequency‐response analysis (150–390 kHz), yielding 10,000 interpolated features. After in‐fold LARS feature‐selection and stability‐thresholding, three classifiers (5‐NN, SVC, and MLP) were evaluated via nested CV. The best model (MLP) attained 0.81 ± 0.08 accuracy, with true‐negative rates above 90%, but modest true‐positive recall (25–35%).

Integrated Impact
By combining proactive parameter tuning with vibration‐based NDE, the framework enables the removal of the majority of defective builds before certification and replaces hour‐long CT scans with minute‐scale vibration tests. This dual‐stream approach lays the groundwork for scalable, in‐situ quality assurance in AM, offering a path toward the real‐time monitoring and digital‐twin certification of complex parts.

Keywords
Additive Manufacturing (AM)
Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF)
Process Parameter Optimization
Machine Learning
Relative Density
Vibration Analysis
Modal Analysis
Non‐Destructive Evaluation (NDE)
Computed Tomography (CT) Alternatives
Quality Assurance
Direct ink writing of hydroxyapatite based paste scaffolds for absorption-release of drug solutions
Synthesis and Investigation of Structural, Mechanical and Optical Properties of Porous ZnO Nano Particles Prepared Via Eco-frindly Technique