EventsThe 9th International Electronic Conference on Water Sciences
Published
This submission belongs to the session S2. Urban Water Modelling and Management of the event The 9th International Electronic Conference on Water Sciences
Published date
06 Nov, 2025
Academic Editor
author-avatarAbbas Roozbahani
Citation
Alex Javier Garzón-Orduña, Modesto Pérez-Sánchez, Oscar Coronado Hernandez, Alfonso Arrieta, Helena Ramos, Non-Revenue Water (NRW) and Leakage Management: Global KPIs and Modelling Challenges, in Proceedings of The 9th International Electronic Conference on Water Sciences, 11 November–14 November 2025, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Non-Revenue Water (NRW) and Leakage Management: Global KPIs and Modelling Challenges

image
image
image
image
1. Department of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV), Valencia 46022, Spain, Colombia
2. Department of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV), Valencia 46022, Spain, Spain
3. Instituto de Hidráulica y Saneamiento Ambiental, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena 130001, Colombia, Colombia
4. Civil Engineering Research and Innovation for Sustainability (CERIS), Instituto Superior Técnico, Department of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, University of Lisbon, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal, Portugal
Abstract

The water distribution system is a critical infrastructure for achieving Sustainable Development Goal 6, yet global inefficiencies remain due to high levels of Non-Revenue Water (NRW). This term refers to water that is lost before it reaches the consumer, primarily due to physical leaks, metering inaccuracies, or unauthorised consumption. Global NRW averages 29.5%, with extremes ranging from 4% in Singapore to 83% in Armenia (Liemberger & Wyatt, 2019). These losses equate to over 126 billion cubic metres annually, undermining both economic performance and water security in the face of climate change.

This study conducts a global assessment of NRW using two key performance indicators: the NRW percentage and the leak flow index (L/s/km). Drawing from international databases and reports (Lambert, 2001; Pokhrel et al., 2023), the analysis categorises countries and continents according to infrastructure conditions and efficiency thresholds. The review also evaluates conventional hydraulic models and compares them with dynamic approaches such as the Rigid Water Column Model (RWCM), which accounts for transient pressure effects during operations (Coronado-Hernández et al., 2024; Fuertes-Miquel et al., 2024).

Our findings show that 76.6% of countries exceed the 25% NRW threshold that is deemed economically inefficient, and 25% report values above 40%. Leak indices range widely, from 0.002 to 4.93 L/s/km, and correlate strongly with ageing infrastructure and inadequate pressure control (Thornton et al., 2008; Giustolisi et al., 2024). RWCM-based simulations reveal that standard Extended Period Simulation (EPS) models may underestimate leakage by 18–55% due to their inability to capture inertial effects.

Reducing NRW by one-third could supply 800 million people annually and generate savings of up to USD 13 billion. The proposed integration of RWCM with machine learning involves using time series generated by dynamic hydraulic simulations as training data for predictive models that estimate leakage behaviour under varying operational conditions. This hybrid approach offers a promising pathway to design smarter interventions, optimise pressure management, and enhance the resilience of water distribution networks.

Keywords
Non-Revenue Water (NRW)
Leakage Index
Pressure Management
Rigid Water Column Model (RWCM)
Machine Learning
Transient Hydraulic Modelling
Sustainable Water Distribution
Oral Presentation
Historical Evolution and Software Selection Criteria for Transient Hydraulic Analysis with Hydro-Pneumatic Protection
Unsupervised Timely Detection of Leaks in Water Network DMAs using a Robust Regression Ensemble Method