EventsThe 9th International Electronic Conference on Water Sciences
Published
This submission belongs to the session S8. Wastewater Treatment and Reuse of the event The 9th International Electronic Conference on Water Sciences
Published date
06 Nov, 2025
Academic Editor
author-avatarCarmen Teodosiu
Citation
Olalekan Simon Awoyemi, Ravi Naidu, Hybrid Ultrasonic-Oxidative Treatment of PFASs in Firefighting Foams and Enriched Foam Waste, in Proceedings of The 9th International Electronic Conference on Water Sciences, 11 November–14 November 2025, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Hybrid Ultrasonic-Oxidative Treatment of PFASs in Firefighting Foams and Enriched Foam Waste

image
1. Global Centre for Environmental Remediation (GCER), School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan NSW 2308, Australia, Australia
2. CRC for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment (CRC CARE), University of Newcastle, Callaghan NSW 2308, Australia
Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are highly persistent and toxic contaminants, frequently associated with aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs), a major source of soil and groundwater pollution. Foam fractionation (FF) is often used to concentrate PFASs from AFFFs, producing PFAS-rich foams that pose disposal challenges. Ultrasonic degradation has emerged as a promising remediation strategy, generating extreme cavitation conditions that induce both radical-mediated and pyrolytic breakdown of PFASs. This study evaluates the effect of oxidants—ferric chloride (FeCl3), sodium persulfate (Na2S2O8), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)—on the ultrasonic degradation of two model PFASs (PFOA and PFOS), AFFF, and FF. Ultrasound alone achieved notable defluorination in real-world matrices, with 40% and 46% efficiencies for AFFF and FF, respectively. Addition of Na₂S₂O₈ slightly increased AFFF defluorination to 46% but decreased FF defluorination to 44%, while H₂O₂ maintained 40% for AFFF and enhanced FF to 47%. These results indicate that oxidant effects depend on the matrix: components in AFFF can scavenge reactive species, limiting the benefit of added oxidants, whereas FF allows modest enhancement with H₂O₂. In contrast, pure PFAS solutions consistently exhibited improved defluorination with oxidants. This work underscores both the potential of combining ultrasonication with oxidation chemistry and the critical role of matrix effects in designing effective hybrid PFAS remediation strategies.

Keywords
PFAS
Ultrasonication
Oxidants
AFFF
FF
Poster
MDPI_conference poster.pdf
Oxidative Aging of Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) Microplastics: Implications for Vector Potential toward Methylene Blue
A Socio-Ecological Approach to Wastewater Treatment: Electrochemical Remediation of Cresol