EventsThe 1st International Online Conference on Fermentation
Published
This submission belongs to the session 3. Fermented foods, drinks, and food safety of the event The 1st International Online Conference on Fermentation
Published date
07 Nov, 2025
Academic Editor
author-avatarIris Loira
Citation
Agustina Caffaratti, Alberto Luis Rosa, Maria Laura Raymond Eder, Cross-Tolerance to Sulfite (SO₃H⁻) and Selenite (SeO₃²⁻) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains Carrying SSU1-Associated Chromosomal Rearrangements, in Proceedings of The 1st International Online Conference on Fermentation, 12 November–13 November 2025, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Cross-Tolerance to Sulfite (SO₃H⁻) and Selenite (SeO₃²⁻) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains Carrying SSU1-Associated Chromosomal Rearrangements

Alberto Luis Rosa 1,2
1. Laboratorio de Genética y Biología Celular y Molecular, Departamento de Farmacología Otto Orsingher, IFEC - CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, 5000, Argentina, Argentina
2. Departamento de Agroalimentos, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, 5000, Argentina
Abstract

Introduction: Exposure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to sulfite (SO₃H⁻) in winemaking environments has driven the selection of tolerant strains, often carrying chromosomal rearrangements (CRs) that enhance the expression of a sulfite efflux pump encoded by the gene SSU1. Recent studies suggest that protein ssu1p may also contribute to selenite (SeO₃²⁻) tolerance.

Methods: We identified S. cerevisiae strains carrying SSU1-associated CR VIII-t-XVI and XV-t-XVI. Additional sulfite-tolerant strains were isolated following adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) experiments. Strains were used to investigate the potential connection between tolerance to sulfite and selenite.

Results: Our results show that S. cerevisiae CR strains, which tolerate sulfite levels up to ∼150 mg/L, also grow in media supplemented with high concentrations of selenite (i.e., 1.5 mM), suggesting a shared underlying mechanism of tolerance. Isolated strains obtained after 100 generations of adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) under sulfite pressure were able to grow in a YPD agar supplemented with either sulfite or selenite. Interestingly, these isolates failed to regrow under these selective conditions if previously grown in a YPD agar without selective pressure.

Conclusion: Our findings support the existence of a common mechanism of toxicity for sulfite and selenite and indicate that sulfite/selenite tolerance acquired through ALE may represent a transient adaptive trait.

Keywords
yeast
sulfite
selenite
SSU1
Oral Presentation
Functional food ingredient based on rice bran containing Lactibacillus acidophilus
Utilization of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) byproducts for functional food development: A novel process optimization study