EventsThe 1st International Online Conference on Prosthesis
Published
This submission belongs to the session S1. Dental Restorative Materials in Prosthodontics of the event The 1st International Online Conference on Prosthesis
Published date
05 Dec, 2025
Academic Editor
author-avatarMarco Cicciù
Citation
Neada Hysenaj, Edlira Mulo, Vergjini Mulo, Edit Xhajanka, OCCLUSAL SPLINTS THICKNESS IN THE TREATMENT OF TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDERS, REVIEW OF CURRENT EVIDENCE., in Proceedings of The 1st International Online Conference on Prosthesis, 10 December–12 December 2025, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

OCCLUSAL SPLINTS THICKNESS IN THE TREATMENT OF TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDERS, REVIEW OF CURRENT EVIDENCE.

image
image
1. Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Medicine, Tirana, 1005, Albania, Albania
Abstract

Introduction. Occlusal splints are oral appliances which has been designed to relieve the temporomandibular symptoms. Anyway, the thickness of occlusal splints in order to have optimal efficacy is still controversial. Methods. An electronic search in Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was conducted, using the following keywords up to January 2025:
(“occlusal splint” OR “stabilization splint” OR “bite splint”) AND (“vertical dimension” OR “thickness” OR “occlusal height”) AND (“temporomandibular disorder” OR “TMD” OR “disc displacement” OR “myofascial pain”). All titles and abstracts were screened.
Studies comparing different thicknesses of occlusal splints were included. Results. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, from which five randomized controlled trials, one retrospective study, and two finite element analyses. Mixed quality of the studies was found. Based on current evidence, although limited, the following results could be deduced: Occlusal splints with moderate thickness, 3 mm, are recommended for those cases that involve both muscular and joint components, particularly when masticatory muscle pain is the primary complaint. Occlusal splints with minimal thickness, 2 mm, may be appropriate in internal derangements in the early stage, though evidence is low. Thicker splints, ≥4 mm for DDwoR and in cases with crepitus. Occlusal splints of ≤2 mm and >6 mm were associated with symptoms such as reduced functional outcomes or comfort. Conclusion. In most cases, occlusal splints with thicknesses of 3–5 mm seem to be optimal for most TMD cases; however, personalized treatment based on the respective diagnosis is recommended. The decision on splint thickness should be based on evidence according to the severity of the diagnosis, but also patient-centered, to achieve comfort, the compliance of the patient, and oral structure preservation. Further high-quality RCTs are needed to have evidence-based guidelines and to achieve consistent results.

Keywords
Temporomandibular disorders
occlusal splint
thickness
stabilization splint
disc displacement
A Full Digital Workflow for Immediate Removable Denture Fabrication and Overdenture Rehabilitation in Elderly Patients: A Proof of Concept for Maxilla and Mandible
Cast Gold vs. Fiber Post-and-Core in Restoring Severely Compromised Mandibular Molars: A 3D-Finite Element Analysis