EventsThe 5th International Electronic Conference on Agronomy
Published
This submission belongs to the session S7. Precision and Digital Agriculture of the event The 5th International Electronic Conference on Agronomy
Published date
11 Dec, 2025
Academic Editor
author-avatarOscar Vicente
Citation
Yordanis Garcia Dousat, Miguel Araya-Alman, Héctor Valdés Gómez, Ruber Hernández García, Unsupervised Learning and Geostatistics for Vineyard Management Zone Delineation: Integrating PCA, Clustering, and Kriging in Chile’s Maule Valleys, in Proceedings of The 5th International Electronic Conference on Agronomy, 15 December–18 December 2025, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Unsupervised Learning and Geostatistics for Vineyard Management Zone Delineation: Integrating PCA, Clustering, and Kriging in Chile’s Maule Valleys

Yordanis Garcia Dousat 1
image
image
1. Faculty of Engineering, Catholic University of Maule, Talca, 3460000, Chile, Chile
2. Center of Interior Drylands / Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Catholic University of Maule, Talca, 3460000, Chile, Chile
3. Faculty of Agronomy and Natural Systems, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Santiago de Chile, 8320000, Chile, Chile
4. Department of Computer Science and Industries / Faculty of Engineering, Catholic University of Maule, Talca, 3460000, Chile, Chile
Abstract

Powdery mildew (Erysiphe necator (Schw.) Burr.) is a pathogen that threatens vineyard sustainability and profitability. This study presents a reproducible framework that integrates unsupervised machine learning with geostatistics to delineate risk and management zones in Vitis vinifera L. vineyards in Chile’s Maule Region. The workflow comprises (i) data preprocessing; (ii) dimensionality reduction via rotated principal component analysis (PCA) to synthesize multisource attributes; (iii) segmentation and dominance assessment from rotated scores to identify key agronomic factors (e.g., vigor and yield); (iv) spatial validation through factor-wise grouping and cross-validation; (v) geostatistical modeling—empirical isotropic and directional variograms, weighted least-squares fitting to extended models, model selection by cross-validation—followed by kriging of principal components and their variances; (vi) clustering-based delineation of management zones projected onto a spatial grid; and (vii) spatial interpolation and fusion to produce discretized backgrounds with contours of the dominant component. Across seasons, retained components explained at least 70% of the total variance. Silhouette coefficients of 0.47–0.56 indicated moderate-to-good separation and stable dominance patterns. Moran’s I was significant in the first two seasons, evidencing spatial dependence and interannual variation. Cross-validated isotropic ranges typically spanned 25–90 m, reaching ~170 m depending on season and component; directional analysis revealed anisotropy with predominant NE–SW (≈45°) continuity. The framework yields continuous severity/incidence maps and coherent management zones, supporting site-specific management and reduced pesticide use in precision viticulture.

Keywords
Precision agriculture
Viticulture
Management Zones
Site-Specific Management
Integrating Corrected and Reconstructed Climate Data and Multiple-Crop-Model Output to Improve Wheat Yield Prediction under Climate Change
Mushroom Kothi: An IoT-Enabled Climate Control Chamber for Precision Oyster Mushroom Cultivation