EventsThe 1st International Online Conference on Societies
Published
This submission belongs to the session S4. Equity/Equality, Diversity and Inclusion of the event The 1st International Online Conference on Societies
Published date
19 Jan, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarRoda Madziva
Citation
Miloș (Ilie) Constantina Alina, Mihaela Luminița Sandu, Mariana Floricica Călin, Mihaela Rus, Social and Professional Support for Single-Parent Families: Urban–Rural Disparities in Perceptions of Inclusion Policies, in Proceedings of The 1st International Online Conference on Societies, 21 January–23 January 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Social and Professional Support for Single-Parent Families: Urban–Rural Disparities in Perceptions of Inclusion Policies

image
image
1. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ovidius University, Bulevardul Mamaia, nr. 124, Constanta, Romania, Romania
2. Faculty of Law and Administrative Sciences, “Ovidius” University from Constanta, 400470 Constanta, Romania, Romania
3. Institute of Philosophy and Psychology, Romanian Academy, 050731 Bucharest, Romania
4. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, “Ovidius” University of Constanța, Bd. Mamaia 124, 900527 Constanța, Romania., Romania
Abstract

Introduction. Single-parent families, a vulnerable social group, face unique challenges in urban and rural areas, including economic hardship, limited professional opportunities, and social marginalization. The effectiveness of public policies and support programs in mitigating these risks varies depending on the social and geographical context, underscoring the need for tailored interventions.

Methods. The study employed a self-developed 22-item questionnaire administered to ninety-five respondents from both urban and rural areas of Romania. The instrument assessed access to, relevance of, and effectiveness of social inclusion policies, social support services, and professional support programs targeting single parents. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, normality tests, the Mann–Whitney U test, and Chi-square tests.

Results. The findings revealed significant urban–rural differences related to belief in social inclusion policies, accessibility of support services, and the availability of professional training opportunities. Urban respondents tended to be more critical but acknowledged the existence of specific services, while rural participants reported more acute deficiencies, emphasizing a lack of resources and opportunities. The most common barriers found included bureaucratic procedures, stigmatization, and insufficient specialized services. Moreover, respondents perceived professional support measures, such as career counseling and flexible employment, as inadequate, with rural participants expressing higher levels of dissatisfaction.

Conclusions. The results underscore the potential impact of tailored policy measures on the specific challenges of urban and rural environments. Priority actions should include expanding psychosocial counseling, strengthening professional training programs, promoting flexible employment opportunities, and fostering closer cooperation between employers and public authorities. Reducing territorial disparities is essential to ensure fair access to social and professional support for single-parent families and to foster their full social inclusion.

Keywords
single-parent families
social support
inclusion policies
professional support
urban–rural differences
Poster
Sandu_Calin_Rus_Ilie.pdf
Psychological Values and Attitudinal Predictors of Sustainable Tourism Consumption
Immersive Virtual Reality for Peer Support in Spinal Cord Injury: A Qualitative Pilot Study