EventsThe 1st International Online Conference on Environments
Published
This submission belongs to the session S6. Ecological, Environmental and Circular Economics of the event The 1st International Online Conference on Environments
Published date
27 Feb, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarWALTER ALBERTO PENGUE
Citation
Kaouther Kerboua, Hamza Cheniti, Carbon footprint related to municipal solid waste management in upper middle-income countries: a multi-factorial study based on composition, operations and management strategies, in Proceedings of The 1st International Online Conference on Environments, 2 March–4 March 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Carbon footprint related to municipal solid waste management in upper middle-income countries: a multi-factorial study based on composition, operations and management strategies

1. Department of Process and Energy Engineering, National Higher School of Technology and Engineering, 23005 Annaba, Algeria., Algeria
2. Laboratory of Mining, Metallurgy and Materials L3M, National Higher School of Technology and Engineering, Annaba, Algeria.
3. Environmental Research Center, 23000, Annaba, Algeria, Algeria
4. Department of Mining Engineering, National Higher School of Technology and Engineering, 23005 Annaba, Algeria
Abstract

The geographic and economic contexts play a major role in the decision making when it comes to municipal solid waste management. In the present study, simulations are carried out using Waste and Resource Assessment Tool for Environment (WRATE) software academic version 3.0.1, based on the Ecoinvent database (version 2), to assess the greenhouse gas emissions released by 1 M tonnes of municipal solid waste with typical compositions characterizing upper middle-income countires, with an organic fraction around 50% in weight. The variation over time (2000 to 2022) with no intended transformation in the management strategy is first analysed, and then several transformations are applied by varying the waste management routes (open dumping, landfilling, recycling and comosting) as well as the energy recovery integration. The results are then discussed based on the waste categories and the performed operations (landfilling, recycling, transportation, treatment and recovery). The results revealed that the most promising scenario involves limited open dumping that does not exceed 10%, landfilling with at least 20% energy recovery, and major fractions that address composting and recycling. Overall, this scenario returns a negative carbon footprint with a value surrounding -0.35 tons of CO2-Eq/ton of MSW. The results serve as a decision tool in similar contexts to plan for the most affordable transformations according to the parameters covered by the study.

Keywords
Landfilling
Energy recovery
Waste category
Transformation
Greenhouse gas emissions
Life cycle assessment.
Oral Presentation
Biodiversity Protection and Pollinator Conservation: An Integrated Approach of the Medibees Project
Optimizing SP-ICP-MS for Detection of Silver Nanoparticles in Water: Implications for Environmental Monitoring