EventsThe 5th International Electronic Conference on Brain Sciences & 1st International Electronic Conference on Neurosciences
Published
This submission belongs to the session S3. Behavioral Neuroscience of the event The 5th International Electronic Conference on Brain Sciences & 1st International Electronic Conference on Neurosciences
Published date
04 Mar, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarStephen Meriney
Citation
Paula Denisa Saragea, Comparative Analysis of Experimental Models in Alzheimer’s Disease Research: From Transgenic Paradigms to Pharmacological Induction, in Proceedings of The 5th International Electronic Conference on Brain Sciences & 1st International Electronic Conference on Neurosciences, 9 March–11 March 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Comparative Analysis of Experimental Models in Alzheimer’s Disease Research: From Transgenic Paradigms to Pharmacological Induction

image
1. Laboratory of Animal Physiology, Faculty of Biology, "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" University, Iasi, Romania, Romania
Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) represents the leading cause of dementia globally, characterized by progressive cognitive decline, β-amyloid (Aβ) aggregation, tau hyperphosphorylation, neuroinflammation, and synaptic dysfunction. Due to its complex multifactorial nature, the development of appropriate animal models has become indispensable for understanding the pathophysiology of AD and identifying potential therapeutic targets.

This paper provides a comparative analysis of the principal preclinical models used in AD research, encompassing transgenic, pharmacological, and toxin-induced paradigms. Transgenic models, such as 5×FAD, APP/PS1, and 3×Tg-AD, replicate essential molecular and behavioral features of familial AD. The 5×FAD line, carrying five human APP and PSEN1 mutations, develops early and aggressive amyloid pathology with profound cognitive deficits, while the 3×Tg-AD model integrates both amyloid and tau lesions, offering broader pathological relevance. Pharmacological models, including scopolamine- and streptozotocin-induced neurotoxicity, mimic sporadic AD through cholinergic hypofunction and impaired insulin signaling. Toxicological paradigms employing β-amyloid peptides or aluminum compounds reproduce oxidative stress and neuronal loss typical of late-stage pathology.

A critical comparison of these models in terms of construct, face, and predictive validity highlights their differential translational potential and limitations. While transgenic models provide genetic precision, pharmacological paradigms allow reversible and cost-effective testing of neuroprotective agents. Integrative approaches combining genetic, metabolic, and environmental factors promise more faithful recapitulation of human AD. This synthesis underscores the necessity of methodological pluralism, ethical refinement, and data reproducibility to advance preclinical neuroscience and accelerate therapeutic discovery in neurodegenerative research.

Keywords
Alzheimer’s disease
transgenic models
5×FAD
APP/PS1
3×Tg-AD
neurodegeneration
translational neuroscience
pharmacological models
Machine Learning in Psychiatric Research: A Systematic Review of Predictive and Mechanistic Models
Cognitive impairments induced by valproic acid in Wistar rats: experimental validation of the Three-tower maze