EventsThe 5th International Electronic Conference on Brain Sciences & 1st International Electronic Conference on Neurosciences
Published
This submission belongs to the session S7. Systems Neuroscience of the event The 5th International Electronic Conference on Brain Sciences & 1st International Electronic Conference on Neurosciences
Published date
04 Mar, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarVasileios T. Papaliagkas
Citation
Mousa Javidialsaadi, Scott T Albert, Jinsung Wang, Task-dependent modulation of aftereffects during visuomotor adaptation, in Proceedings of The 5th International Electronic Conference on Brain Sciences & 1st International Electronic Conference on Neurosciences, 9 March–11 March 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Task-dependent modulation of aftereffects during visuomotor adaptation

Scott T Albert 2
1. Kinesiology programs, Zilber College of Public Health, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA, USA
2. Neuroscience Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, USA
Abstract

Introduction Implicit motor adaptation is widely described as having a fixed ceiling of 12–15° that does not scale with perturbation size when explicit strategies are suppressed. We examined how this ceiling changes when participants experience two different visuomotor rotation magnitudes (24° and 48°) under gradual versus error-clamped schedules.

Methods Forty-one participants adapted to 24° and 48° rotations in counterbalanced order across two sessions. Perturbations were introduced either gradually (stepped increments designed to minimize the awareness of the visuomotor perturbation) or via error-clamp (constant clamped feedback that eliminates explicit aiming). Immediate aftereffects were measured during the first four no-feedback trials after each exposure.

Results In the gradual groups, aftereffects scaled strongly with the perturbation size (first exposure: 12.7° after 24° vs. 24.8° after 48°, t(19)=6.06, p<0.001; second exposure: 24.4° vs. 16.3°). In the error-clamped groups, aftereffects remained ∼11–14° regardless of whether participants had just experienced a 24° or 48° clamp (all ps>0.18).

Conclusions When visuomotor adaptation occurs gradually, implicit aftereffects are flexibly modulated based on the rotation size. When the adaptation occurs under the error-clamped condition, aftereffects are fixed at approximately 13° irrespective of the rotation size. These results indicate that the “fixed ceiling” effect known to follow implicit adaptation may be task dependent.

Keywords
implicit adaptation
gradual adaptation
error-clamp
learning capacity
task goals
A Systems Biology Approach to unravel the common genes and pathways in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Traumatic Brain Injury
Interactive Brain Interface for Multimodal EEG Visualization and Disease-Specific Neural Dynamics