EventsThe 5th International Electronic Conference on Brain Sciences & 1st International Electronic Conference on Neurosciences
Published
This submission belongs to the session S6. Neurotechnology and Neuroimaging of the event The 5th International Electronic Conference on Brain Sciences & 1st International Electronic Conference on Neurosciences
Published date
13 Mar, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarJames Brasic
Citation
Daiki Matsuda, Jirou Nakamura, Toshio Higashi, Learning-Dependent Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability During TMS-Based Neurofeedback, in Proceedings of The 5th International Electronic Conference on Brain Sciences & 1st International Electronic Conference on Neurosciences, 9 March–11 March 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Learning-Dependent Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability During TMS-Based Neurofeedback

Jirou Nakamura 2
Toshio Higashi 2
1. Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka International University of Health and Welfare, 3-6-40 Momochihama, Sawara-ku, Fukuoka 814-0001, Japan, Japan
2. Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan., Japan
Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) provides a direct and reliable method for probing corticospinal excitability via motor-evoked potentials (MEPs). While neurofeedback (NF) approaches using EEG or fMRI have demonstrated learning-related neural modulation, it remains unclear whether repeated NF based on TMS-elicited MEPs can induce stable, learning-dependent changes in corticospinal output across multiple training sessions.

In this study, we investigated longitudinal changes in corticospinal excitability during TMS-based neurofeedback training. Twenty-two healthy adults were randomly assigned to a feedback (FB) group or a control (CON) group. Participants performed motor imagery-based mental practice over six training days (three sessions per week for two weeks). During each trial, a single TMS pulse was delivered over the left primary motor cortex at a fixed time, and MEPs were recorded from the right first dorsal interosseous muscle. In the FB group, trial-by-trial normalized MEP amplitudes were visually presented to participants as neurofeedback, whereas the CON group performed identical training without feedback.

Repeated-measures analysis revealed a significant interaction between group and training day for normalized MEP amplitudes. The FB group exhibited a consistent increase in corticospinal excitability from Day 2 through Day 6 relative to baseline, indicating the early acquisition and maintenance of neurophysiological modulation. In contrast, the CON group showed a significant increase in MEP amplitude on only a single training day, suggesting limited learning without feedback.

These findings demonstrate that TMS-based neurofeedback can facilitate learning-dependent modulation of corticospinal excitability across repeated sessions. The results highlight the potential of MEP-guided neurofeedback as a powerful experimental framework for studying motor system plasticity and neural self-regulation, and as a methodological foundation for future neurophysiological and brain-stimulation-based research.

Keywords
motor imagery
transcranial magnetic stimulation
neurofeedback
motor evoked potentials
corticospinal excitability
motor system plasticity
Effects of Different Stress States on Athletes’ Cognitive Function and the Underlying Neural Mechanisms
Cognitive Neurological Mechanisms and Causal Analysis of Brain-to-Brain Synchronization Between Teachers and Students