EventsThe 1st International Online Conference on Healthcare
Published
This submission belongs to the session S4. Clinical Data Management—Balancing Transparency with Innovation for Enhanced Care Quality of the event The 1st International Online Conference on Healthcare
Published date
20 Mar, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarRüdiger Pryss
Citation
Joshua Khorsandi, Brian Mansoury, Justin Kahen, Aria Damavandi, Michael Kahen, Moez Khorsandi, Federated Learning in Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Transparency, Privacy, and Clinical Utility, in Proceedings of The 1st International Online Conference on Healthcare, 25 March–26 March 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Federated Learning in Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Transparency, Privacy, and Clinical Utility

Brian Mansoury 1
Moez Khorsandi 3
1. Department of Life Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA., USA
2. Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine, University of Nevada Las Vegas, NV 89106, USA., USA
3. Clinical Professor of Surgery, Western University of Health Sciences, CA 91766, USA., USA
Abstract

Introduction: Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for training machine learning models on distributed clinical data without centralizing patient information. While FL is often promoted as a privacy-preserving alternative to traditional centralized learning, its real-world transparency, regulatory alignment, and clinical utility remain unclear. This systematic review synthesizes the current evidence on how FL is implemented in healthcare settings and evaluates its impact on privacy protection, model performance, and clinical integration.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore for studies published between January 2018 and October 2025 that applied FL to real or realistically simulated clinical datasets. Eligible studies reported at least one of the following: technical details of FL implementation, privacy or security evaluation, model performance versus centralized approaches, or clinical workflow integration. Two independent reviewers screened records, extracted data, and assessed study quality according to the PRISMA recommendations. FL implementations were thematically categorized by clinical domain, data modality, and privacy/monitoring mechanisms.

Results: In total, 1686 articles were screened, and 90 met our inclusion criteria. Most included studies focused on imaging-intensive fields such as radiology, oncology, and ophthalmology, with fewer applications in laboratory medicine, primary care, and mental health. Across domains, FL models generally achieved performance comparable to centralized training. However, formal privacy evaluations (e.g., membership inference, gradient leakage tests, or differential privacy guarantees) were reported inconsistently. Transparency was limited by sparse reporting on model governance, auditability, and communication with clinicians or patients. Very few studies progressed beyond technical feasibility to sustained clinical deployment.

Conclusions: Federated learning shows strong potential to reconcile multi-institutional data sharing constraints with performant AI models, but current implementations do not address transparency and privacy guarantees sufficiently. Standardized reporting frameworks, robust privacy audits, and co-designed governance structures are urgently needed to translate FL from experimental prototypes into clinical infrastructure.

Keywords
Federated learning
healthcare artificial intelligence
privacy-preserving machine learning
clinical integration
Oral Presentation
Real-Time Language Equity in Digital Health Platforms: A Systematic Review of Multilingual Clinical Interfaces and Their Impact on Outcomes for Patients With Limited English Proficiency
Essential Attributes of a Successful Dentist: A Quantitative Study of Chinese Dental Students