EventsThe 1st International Online Conference on Healthcare
Published
This submission belongs to the session S2. Patient-Centered Care—Optimizing Care Pathways through Engagement and Outcome Measurement of the event The 1st International Online Conference on Healthcare
Published date
20 Mar, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarLorraine Evangelista
Citation
Handan aydın kahraman, Gülay İPEK ÇOBAN, Ebru BOZCU KARTAL, Clinical Assessment of Medical Device–Related Pressure Injury Risk: Profiling Risk Levels in Patients Using Medical Devices, in Proceedings of The 1st International Online Conference on Healthcare, 25 March–26 March 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Clinical Assessment of Medical Device–Related Pressure Injury Risk: Profiling Risk Levels in Patients Using Medical Devices

Gülay İPEK ÇOBAN 2
1. Department of Nursing Fundamentals, Faculty of Health Sciences, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan, 24100, Turkey, Turkey (Türkiye)
2. Faculty of Nursing, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey, Turkey (Türkiye)
3. Department of Public Health Nursing, Institute of Health Sciences, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey, Turkey (Türkiye)
Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of pressure injury development among patients exposed to medical devices and to examine the clinical outcomes obtained using the Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale. The scale provides a structured approach for the early identification of pressure injuries associated with medical device application.

Methods: This descriptive and analytical study was conducted with 132 patients receiving medical device applications in a tertiary training and research hospital. Data were collected using a Personal Information Form and the Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale. Total scores range from 8 to 27, representing high-risk (8–12), moderate-risk (13–20), and low-risk (21–27) categories. Statistical analyses conducted in SPSS 26.0 included descriptive statistics, independent and paired t-tests, ANOVA, correlation, and regression analyses. Normality was assessed using Skewness–Kurtosis values, and Wilcoxon and Dunnett’s C tests were applied when parametric assumptions were not met. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Results: Among patients who developed a medical device-related pressure injury, 54.6% were admitted to intensive care units. Overall, 35.8% of participants were classified as high-risk, 40.0% as moderate-risk, and 24.2% as low-risk. Device contact duration, device-related skin pressure, and anatomical application site significantly affected risk scores (p<0.01). Additionally, the patient’s general clinical condition was identified as a strong determinant of risk level.

Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that risk levels are greatly influenced by patient-related factors and device-specific characteristics. The scale proved effective in guiding early detection, systematic monitoring, and preventive nursing interventions. This study highlights the importance of integrating structured MDRPI risk assessment into routine clinical practice to enhance patient safety and improve care outcomes.

Keywords
Medical device–related pressure injury
risk assessment
nursing care
patient safety
critical care
pressure injury prevention.
Oral Presentation
Optimizing Care Pathways Through Digital Symptom Tracking and Patient‑Reported Outcomes.
The Impact of Affective Symptoms on Subjective Memory Complaints: Implications for Patient-Centered Cognitive Assessment and Gender-Sensitive Care