Western and Chinese traditional paintings exhibit profound cognitive and aesthetic differences: Western portraiture emphasizes perceptual realism and psychological states, while Chinese portraiture prioritizes holistic qi-yun and environment harmony. This cultural contrast raises the question of how culture shapes higher-order visual judgment and whether systematic aesthetic biases emerge. To address this, we propose a computationally grounded, experience-based approach. We first interviewed over 100 participants and used grounded theory to organize 43 aesthetic dimensions into four higher-order factors: Perceptual Realism, Expressive Power, Formal Organization, and Cultural Significance.
To avoid imposing Western standards, we employed Qwen—a Chinese-trained Large Language Model (LLM)—as a computational proxy, using this participant-derived framework to evaluate 2,000 historical portraits (1,000 Western, 1,000 Chinese). Results showed that, despite acknowledging Chinese strengths in Formal Organization and Cultural Significance, Qwen significantly favored Western works overall (), particularly due to high sensitivity to chiaroscuro and anatomical detail within the Perceptual Realism dimension. This bias aligns with the cross-cultural distinction between object-focused (Western) and field-dependent (East Asian) perceptual styles. Methodologically, this demonstrates that even culturally informed LLMs can reproduce dominant aesthetic norms if the evaluation framework is implicitly biased. Theoretically, it confirms that high-level aesthetic judgment is mediated by implicit evaluative schemas. This study offers an empirically grounded pathway toward more culturally equitable paradigms in AI-assisted cognitive science.