EventsThe 1st International Online Conference on Social Sciences
Published
This submission belongs to the session S5. Society and Technology of the event The 1st International Online Conference on Social Sciences
Published date
25 May, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarPierre Desrochers
Citation
Harjeet Kaur, Avijit Silawat, Dipesh Silawat, The Displacement of Algorithmic Authority Infrastructure and the Rearrangement of Governance in the Global South, in Proceedings of The 1st International Online Conference on Social Sciences, 28 May–29 May 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

The Displacement of Algorithmic Authority Infrastructure and the Rearrangement of Governance in the Global South

Dipesh Silawat 3
1. Euclid University, Campus ENAM, Avenue de France, Quartier Sica Saidou, Bangui, Central African Republic, PO Box number BP 157, Central African Republic, United Arab Emirates
2. School of Law, Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya (D.A.V.V.), Indore, Madhya Pradesh, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, 452001, India, India
3. Government New Law College, Affiliated to Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya (D.A.V.V.), Indore, Madhya Pradesh, 452001, India, India
Abstract

Introduction:

Artificial intelligence (AI) is slowly entering policing, welfare support, and the legal systems of the Global South, thereby changing how institutions operate. The introduction of AI in the Global South is not only a technological phenomenon of modernization of the equipment, but also a complete restructuring of the government, which was realized by replacing the current infrastructure. Without transparency and challenge mechanisms, the locus of accountability will move not only out of the formal oversight structures, but also into more opaque processes.

Methods:

The research will use a mixed-methods approach to compare the acceptance of AI systems in India, Brazil, and Kenya. It analyzes 35 procurement contracts, AI strategy studies on the national level, and statistical data of predictive policing and welfare automation. Those findings are critically triangulated against 24 semi-structured interviews with judges, public defenders, technologists, and representatives of civil society. In place of gauging the effects on efficiency, the analytical framework focuses on the conversion of operational authority, changes in discretionary space, and the stability of procedural protection within institutional practice.

Results:

It has been found that algorithmic infrastructures mechanize the operational power of proprietary technical ecosystems, thus restricting the discretionary judgment and institutional access to model construction and information logic. Respondents identified a few avenues to challenge automated decisions, noting inconsistencies in regulations. The comparative analysis of the three national settings shows that the tendency to refer to outside vendors and spend minimal internal audit power is universal.

Conclusion:

The introduction of AI in the Global South is not only a technological phenomenon of modernizing equipment, but also a complete restructuring of government, achieved by replacing the current infrastructure. Without transparency and challenge mechanisms, the locus of accountability will move not only out of the formal oversight structures, but also into more opaque processes.

Keywords
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence
Algorithmic Governance
Infrastructural Displacement
Global South
Institutional Accountability
Intermittency, Location and Energy Transitions: A critique of Andreas Malm’s water-to-steam power narrative
Seeing Protest Before It Happens