EventsThe 1st International Online Conference on Social Sciences
Published
This submission belongs to the session S5. Society and Technology of the event The 1st International Online Conference on Social Sciences
Published date
25 May, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarPierre Desrochers
Citation
Stănescu Georgiana Camelia, AI Ethics in Romanian Mass Media: Risks and Professional Responsibility, in Proceedings of The 1st International Online Conference on Social Sciences, 28 May–29 May 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

AI Ethics in Romanian Mass Media: Risks and Professional Responsibility

1. Department of Arts and Media, Faculty of Letters, University of Craiova, Craiova str. A. I. Cuza, No 13, 200585, Romania, Romania
Abstract

Artificial intelligence tools are increasingly used in editorial work, bringing significant benefits and new creative opportunities. However, they also raise ethical and professional challenges that require careful consideration. This research investigates the ethical risks associated with the use of AI in the Romanian media system, focusing on phenomena such as algorithmic bias, misinformation, disinformation amplification, and transparency. The analysis also addresses the risk of diminishing human editorial control and the trend toward content standardization.
The research methodology is qualitative, involving 15 semi-structured interviews with media professionals in Romania (10 experienced journalists and 5 editors-in-chief). The results highlight an ambivalent position towards AI integration. Although respondents recognise the operational advantages of automation in optimising workflows, they express consistent concerns about ethical vulnerabilities, reduced editorial responsibility, and the potential amplification of structural dysfunctions already existing in the Romanian media landscape.
Participants co-explain the need to adopt clear ethical codes for the use of AI in newsrooms, as well as coherent, enforceable legal regulations. In the absence of such mechanisms, the uncontrolled integration of AI risks accentuating superficiality, commercial pressures, and the dilution of professional standards. This study advocates a hybrid working model in which AI serves as a tool to complement journalistic practice, without substituting for professional judgment or compromising public trust.

Keywords
artificial intelligence
mass media
AI ethics
algorithmic bias
disinformation
deepfakes
algorithmic transparency.
Legal Framework on Protection of Men from Domestic Violence and Human Rights in India: A Critical Study
Distributional asymmetries in online nutrition discourse across social determinants of health domains on Reddit