Events2nd International Electronic Conference on Entropy and Its Applications
Published
This submission belongs to the session A. Physics and Engineering of the event 2nd International Electronic Conference on Entropy and Its Applications
Published date
05 Nov, 2015
Citation
Rodolfo A. Fiorini, Entropy, Decoherence and Spacetime Splitting, in Proceedings of 2nd International Electronic Conference on Entropy and Its Applications, 15 November–30 November 2015, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland, doi: 10.3390/ecea-2-A003
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Entropy, Decoherence and Spacetime Splitting

image
1. Politecnico di Milano, Italy
Abstract

Objects in classical world model are in an "either/or" kind of state. A compass needle cannot point both north and south at the same time. The quantum world, by contrast, is "both/and" and a magnetic atom model has no trouble at pointing both directions at once. When that is the case, physicists say that a quantum object is in a "superposition" of states. In previous paper, we already discussed the major intrinsic limitations of "Science 1.0" arbitrary multi-scale (AMS) modeling and strategies to get better simulation results by "Science 2.0" approach. In 2014, Computational information conservation theory (CICT) has shown that even the most sophisticated instrumentation system is completely unable to reliably discriminate so called "random noise" (RN) from any combinatorically optimized encoded message (OECS, optimized exponential cyclic sequence), called "deterministic noise" (DN) by CICT. Unfortunately, the "probabilistic veil" can be quite opaque computationally, and misplaced precision leads to confusion. The "Science 2.0" paradigm has not yet been completely grasped by many contemporary scientific disciplines and current researchers, so that not all the implications of this big change have been realized hitherto, even less their related, vital applications. Thus, one of the key questions in understanding the quantum-classical transition is what happens to the superposition as you go up that atoms-to-apple scale. Exactly when and how does "both/and" become "either/or"? As an example, we present and discuss the observer space-time splitting case. In other words, we show spacetime mapping to classical system additive representation with entropy generation. It is exactly at this point that "both/and" becomes "either/or" representation by usual Science 1.0 approach. CICT new awareness of a discrete HG (hyperbolic geometry) subspace (reciprocal space) of coded heterogeneous hyperbolic structures, underlying the familiar Q Euclidean (direct space) surface representation can open the way to holographic information geometry (HIG) to recover system lost coherence and to overall system minimum entropy representation.

Keywords
quantum-classical transition
CICT
decoherence
minimum entropy
combinatorics
OECS
Manuscript
Entropy as a metric generator of dissipation in metriplectic systems
Are Shannon entropy and Residual entropy synonyms?