EventsThe 5th International Electronic Conference on Cancers
Published
This submission belongs to the session S5. Causes, Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer of the event The 5th International Electronic Conference on Cancers
Published date
05 Jun, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarMasaharu Seno
Citation
Xu Liu, Yantao Tian, Progression Control With Neoadjuvant DOS Versus SOX in HER2-Negative Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Multicenter Real-World Survival and Subgroup Evidence, in Proceedings of The 5th International Electronic Conference on Cancers, 10 June–12 June 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Progression Control With Neoadjuvant DOS Versus SOX in HER2-Negative Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Multicenter Real-World Survival and Subgroup Evidence

1. Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China, China
Abstract

Background
Whether neoadjuvant DOS (docetaxel/oxaliplatin/S-1) improves long-term outcomes compared with SOX (oxaliplatin/S-1) in HER2-negative LAGC remains uncertain, particularly in routine practice.

Methods
This multicenter retrospective cohort included consecutive HER2-negative cT2N⁺ or cT3–4NanyM0 gastric adenocarcinoma patients receiving ≥2 cycles of neoadjuvant DOS or SOX (four Chinese tertiary centers, 2010–2024). Disease-free survival (DFS; surgery to relapse/death) and overall survival (OS; surgery to death) were secondary endpoints. Survival analyses used Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards models after PSM (1:1) and IPTW. A perioperative-consistency sensitivity cohort (same regimen pre- and post-operatively) was included and MPR–survival association analyses were performed. Prespecified subgroup analyses assessed effect heterogeneity.

Results
A total of 1,283 patients were analyzed (DOS 461; SOX 822). DFS analyses were performed in R0-resected radical surgery patients (median follow-up 35.1 months; 430 DFS events), and OS analyses in the entire cohort (median follow-up 34.9 months; 519 deaths). In unadjusted DFS comparisons, DOS did not significantly outperform SOX; however, adjusted analyses showed favorable trends (PSM HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.66–1.02; IPTW HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.66–1.02). In multivariable Cox models, DOS significantly reduced progression risk in IPTW (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59–0.93; P=0.010) and was borderline in PSM (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65–1.00; P=0.052). OS was similar across regimens in all cohorts. Findings were consistent in the perioperative-consistency sensitivity cohort. Achieving MPR was associated with longer DFS (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50–0.82) and OS (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56–0.92). DFS benefit of DOS was most evident in patients aged ≥65 years, those with lower tumor burden (cT2–3 or cN0–1), and proximal tumors.

Conclusions
Neoadjuvant DOS improved progression control versus SOX after rigorous adjustment without an OS difference at current follow-up; MPR strongly correlated with survival, and selected subgroups may derive greater DFS benefit.

Keywords
disease-free survival
overall survival
inverse probability weighting
subgroup analysis
HER2-negative
locally advanced gastric cancer
Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma of the Endometrium with Mucinous Differentiation: An Anatomopathological Case Report
Neoadjuvant DOS Versus SOX for HER2-Negative Locally Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Pathological Response and Perioperative Safety in a Multicenter Real-World Cohort