EventsThe 5th International Electronic Conference on Cancers
Published
This submission belongs to the session S5. Causes, Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer of the event The 5th International Electronic Conference on Cancers
Published date
05 Jun, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarMasaharu Seno
Citation
Xu Liu, Yantao Tian, Neoadjuvant DOS Versus SOX for HER2-Negative Locally Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Pathological Response and Perioperative Safety in a Multicenter Real-World Cohort, in Proceedings of The 5th International Electronic Conference on Cancers, 10 June–12 June 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Neoadjuvant DOS Versus SOX for HER2-Negative Locally Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Pathological Response and Perioperative Safety in a Multicenter Real-World Cohort

1. Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China, China
Abstract

Background
Phase II evidence suggests that adding docetaxel to S-1/oxaliplatin may deepen pathological response in HER2-negative locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC), but large head-to-head real-world evidence versus the standard SOX regimen is limited.

Methods
We retrospectively reviewed consecutive HER2-negative gastric adenocarcinoma patients (cT2N⁺ or cT3–4NanyM0) treated with ≥2 cycles of neoadjuvant DOS (docetaxel/oxaliplatin/S-1) or SOX (oxaliplatin/S-1) at four high-volume Chinese centers (2010–2024). Major pathological response (MPR; Mandard TRG 1–2) was the primary endpoint; perioperative outcomes included R0 resection and severe postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo ≥III). Confounding was addressed using propensity-score matching (PSM, 1:1) and inverse probability-of-treatment weighting (IPTW). Robustness was assessed by effect-size metrics (OR/RR) and E-values.

Results
Among 1,283 eligible patients (DOS 461; SOX 822), PSM yielded 446 well-balanced pairs (all SMD<0.10), and IPTW achieved good balance with stabilized/truncated weights. DOS consistently improved MPR versus SOX across analytic cohorts: unadjusted, 25.7% vs 17.8% (P=0.002); PSM, 25.7% vs 17.8% (P=0.009); and IPTW, 24.8% vs 17.4% (P=0.005). In the matched cohort, DOS increased MPR (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.14–2.23; RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.10–1.88), with E-values >1.8 across cohorts. Surgical quality and safety were comparable: R0 rates >95% among radical gastrectomy patients, severe complications were rare and identical in the PSM cohort (2.2% vs 2.2%), and perioperative mortality was <1% in both groups.

Conclusions
In a large multicenter real-world cohort, neoadjuvant DOS achieved higher MPR than SOX without compromising perioperative safety, supporting taxane-based triplets as an effective perioperative option for fit HER2-negative LAGC patients.

Keywords
gastric cancer
neoadjuvant chemotherapy
DOS
SOX
major pathological response
propensity score
Progression Control With Neoadjuvant DOS Versus SOX in HER2-Negative Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Multicenter Real-World Survival and Subgroup Evidence
Risk-Stratified Benefit of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After First-Line Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer: IPTW and RMST Analyses Guided by an ML Risk Score