EventsThe 1st International Online Conference on Xenobiotics
Published
This submission belongs to the session S2. Nanotoxicology and Targeted Pharmacology of Nanomaterials of the event The 1st International Online Conference on Xenobiotics
Published date
17 Jun, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarKeith Brunt
Citation
Muhammad Waqas, AI-Guided Nanotoxicological and Immunopharmacological Evaluation of Ligand-Functionalized Polymeric Nanoparticles in Targeted Cancer Therapy, in Proceedings of The 1st International Online Conference on Xenobiotics, 22 June–23 June 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

AI-Guided Nanotoxicological and Immunopharmacological Evaluation of Ligand-Functionalized Polymeric Nanoparticles in Targeted Cancer Therapy

1. Department of Zoology, Division of Science and Technology, University of Education, College Road, Lahore, 54770, Pakistan, Pakistan
Abstract

Background:
Polymeric nanoparticles enable targeted drug delivery in cancer therapy, yet concerns regarding nanotoxicity and immune dysregulation limit their clinical translation. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a promising approach to predict and optimize nanoparticle safety profiles prior to experimental validation.

Objective:
To develop an AI-assisted predictive framework for evaluating the nanotoxicological and immunopharmacological properties of folate-conjugated polymeric nanoparticles (FA-PNPs), followed by experimental validation in cancer and immune cell models.

Methods:
An AI-based random forest model was first developed to predict nanoparticle toxicity using physicochemical parameters. FA-PNPs (mean size: 112 ± 8 nm; zeta potential: −18.6 ± 2.1 mV) were then synthesized and characterized. Predicted outcomes were validated experimentally using MTT cytotoxicity assays (MCF-7 and Jurkat cells, 24–72 h), ROS generation (DCFH-DA assay), cytokine profiling (IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ via ELISA), and fluorescence-based cellular uptake studies. Non-functionalized polymeric nanoparticles (PNPs) were included as controls for comparative analysis.

Results:
The AI model demonstrated strong predictive performance (accuracy: 91.3%) and showed high correlation with experimental toxicity outcomes (R² = 0.87). FA-PNPs exhibited selective cytotoxicity toward MCF-7 cells (IC₅₀ = 42.7 µg/mL) compared to Jurkat cells (IC₅₀ = 91.5 µg/mL; p < 0.01). ROS generation increased by 2.8-fold in cancer cells versus 1.3-fold in immune cells. Pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α decreased by 34% and 29%, respectively, while IFN-γ increased by 21%. Compared to non-functionalized PNPs, FA-PNPs showed a 2.5-fold enhancement in cellular uptake.

Conclusion:
This study demonstrates that AI-guided prediction combined with experimental validation provides a robust framework for assessing nanoparticle safety and efficacy. FA-PNPs exhibit enhanced targeting, reduced inflammatory toxicity, and favorable immunomodulatory effects, supporting their potential as safer precision nanotherapeutics for cancer treatment.

Keywords
Nanotoxicology
Artificial Intelligence
Targeted Nanotherapy
Immunomodulation
Polymeric Nanoparticles
Cancer Therapy
Nanosized Titanium Dioxide (E171) in Russia: Particle Size Analysis and Perspectives on Hygienic Regulation
Impact of Dietary Xenobiotics on the Intestinal Activity of Sodin 5: Implications for RIP-Based Nanotherapeutics