EventsThe 1st International Online Conference on Xenobiotics
Published
This submission belongs to the session S1. Environmental Toxicity, Bioaccumulation and Remediation Strategies of the event The 1st International Online Conference on Xenobiotics
Published date
17 Jun, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarA. P. Pinto
Citation
Sara Gaida, Leilei Zhang, Iteb Boughattas, Mohamed Banni, Sabrine Hattab, Pollution-Driven Metabolomic Evidence of Biochar and Compost Effects on a Key Soil Organism, in Proceedings of The 1st International Online Conference on Xenobiotics, 22 June–23 June 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Pollution-Driven Metabolomic Evidence of Biochar and Compost Effects on a Key Soil Organism

Sara Gaida 1
Iteb Boughattas 3
image
Sabrine Hattab 5
1. Laboratory of Ecotoxicology and Agrobiodiversity LR21AGR02, Higher Institute of Agronomy Chott-Mariem, Sousse University, Boîte Postale, Tunisia, Tunisia
2. Department for Sustainable Food Process, Universita Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Via Emilia Parmense 84, 29122 Piacenza, Italy, Italy
3. Laboratory of Ecotoxicology and Agrobiodiversity LR21AGR02, Higher Institute of Agronomy Chott-Mariem, Sousse University, Boîte Postale, Tunisia, Italy
4. Higher Institute of Biotechnology, Monastir University, Monastir, Tunisia, Tunisia
5. Regional Research Centre in Horticulture and Organic Agriculture, Chott-Mariem, 4042 Sousse, Boîte Postale, Tunisia, Tunisia
Abstract

Evaluating the fertility of agricultural soils through biodiversity is essential for sustainable agriculture. Using biochar, compost and their combination become an option to increase soil fertility and rehabilitate degraded land. However, the potential negative effect of these amendments remains poorly understood. This study explored the risks associated with biochar and compost using the earthworm Eisenia Andrei, a key soil organism and bioindicator, exposed to biochar 2% (20gkg-1 soil), and compost 1% (10gkg-1 soil) and their mixture in two soil types (organic and conventional) for 7 and 14 days. To assess cytotoxic and genotoxic effects, lysosomal membrane stability (LMS) and micronucleus (MNi) assays were performed. Biochemical biomarkers, including catalase (CAT), glutathione S-transferase (GST), malondialdehyde (MDA), and acetylcholinesterase (AChE) for neurotoxicity, were analyzed. additionally, earthworm gut metabolomic profiles were examined. Our Results revealed a significant decrease in lysosomal membrane stability (LMS) and an increase in DNA damage (MNi). Neurotoxicity responses varied between organic and conventional soils. Biochemical analysis indicated oxidative stress, as presented by alterations in CAT, GST, and MDA, with the strongest effects observed under combined biochar–compost exposure in both soil types. Moreover, biochar and compost significantly modulated metabolites associated with oxidative stress, inflammatory processes, amino acid biosynthesis, energy metabolism, and nucleic acid pathways, with stronger perturbations under co-exposure. Overall, these findings provide new insights into the toxic mechanism of biochar and compost exposure in earthworms, and highlight the role of the soil management practices in biological responses from multiple perspectives.

Keywords
soil fertility
biochar
compost
Eisenia Andrei
oxidative stress
metabolomics.
Poster
Assessing urban stormwater impacts on Lemna minor using sub-individual biomarkers
Ecotoxicological effects of the commercial fungicide NATIVO® on early development of crop plant species.