EventsThe 3rd International Online Conference on Corrosion and Materials Degradation
Published
This submission belongs to the session S6. Corrosion and Integrity Management in Energy Infrastructure of the event The 3rd International Online Conference on Corrosion and Materials Degradation
Published date
25 Jun, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarFrank Cheng
Citation
Alejandra Blanco, Felipe Freitas, Taylor Gorditsa, From Detection to Action: EMAT‑Driven SCC Assessment, in Proceedings of The 3rd International Online Conference on Corrosion and Materials Degradation, 30 June–2 July 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

From Detection to Action: EMAT‑Driven SCC Assessment

Felipe Freitas 2
Taylor Gorditsa 2
1. H. Rosen de Mexico, S. de R.L., de C.V., Mexico City, Mexico, Mexico
2. ROSEN USA, Inc., East Houston, Texas 77032, USA, USA
Abstract

Introduction.
Stress corrosion cracking (SCC) is a complex degradation mechanism driven by the presence of mechanical stress, a corrosive environment, and the material’s susceptibility. Steel pipelines used for transporting natural gas and oil may be vulnerable, as SCC can initiate and propagate cracks that threaten structural integrity. In advanced stages, the progression of these cracks can reduce the load-carrying capacity of the pipe wall and, under critical conditions, may lead to failure. Consequently, the detection, characterization, and assessment of SCC-related cracking have become components of pipeline integrity management programs.

Methods.
Among the available crack detection technologies in the pipeline industry, Electromagnetic Acoustic Transducer (EMAT) in-line inspection tools have gained relevance in recent years. EMAT technology enables the detection, identification, and sizing of linear indications that may be associated with SCC. However, because of the complexity of SCC morphology (crack colonies, crack interaction), accurate classification and sizing can be challenging. Effective characterization requires field verifications that allow the operator to correlate EMAT signal responses with pipeline properties and actual conditions.

Results.
In a recent case study, field excavation results confirmed that the EMAT tool detected anomalies associated with SCC. However, subsequent destructive testing highlighted adversities in both sizing and classifying these indications, underscoring the challenges associated with characterizing SCC through an ILI alone and reinforcing the need for complementary data integration and field verifications.

Conclusion.
EMAT technology provides capability for detecting and managing anomalies associated with SCC in pipelines, but its effectiveness as part of an SCC integrity management program relies on more than the inspection tool. Threat management requires integrating EMAT results with operational, material, field excavation, destructive testing, and historical data. When EMAT ILI data is combined with material characterization and engineering assessments, operators can make informed integrity decisions and more effectively mitigate the operational risks associated with SCC.

Keywords
Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC)
Pipeline integrity
In-line inspection (ILI)
Electromagnetic Acoustic Transducer (EMAT)
Crack detection
Integrity assessment
Atmospheric corrosivity in a bagasse/coal co-firing power plant influenced by a tropical marine climate
Electrochemical corrosion measurements in low-conductivity bio-oils: decoupling interfacial film memory from bulk electrolyte aging